arXiv:2607. 08335v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Policy-based approaches to Bayesian experimental design (BED) allow the learning of deep policy networks that adaptively make intelligent design decisions based on previously collected data.
By Angus Phillips, Gavin Kerrigan, Tom Rainforth
arXiv:2502. 08004v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Simulation-based inference (SBI) is a method to perform inference on a variety of complex scientific models with challenging inference (inverse) problems.
By Vincent D. Zaballa, Elliot E. Hui
arXiv:2512. 22999v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider problems of parameter estimation where design variables can be actively optimized to maximize information gain.
By Niels Bracher, Lars K\"uhmichel, Desi R. Ivanova, Xavier Intes, Paul-Christian B\"urkner, Stefan T. Radev
arXiv:2607. 16927v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Deep Adaptive Bayesian Screening (DABS), a method for performing adaptive factorial screening in high-dimensional discrete design spaces.
By Jade Lejeune Herman, Arno Strouwen, Johan A. K. Suykens, Peter Goos
The paper introduces a learning-based surrogate approach for stochastic optimization problems where uncertainty depends on the decision, modeled via a nonparametric regression. It constructs a surrogate that embeds iteratively updated Jacobian estimates, using an adaptive random design that focuses sampling near the current iterate to achieve dimension‑independent convergence of the Jacobian estimates. The resulting learning‑based stochastic prox‑linear (L‑SPL) algorithm demonstrates nonasymptotic convergence rates and outperforms existing methods in sample efficiency and objective value in numerical experiments.
By Boyang Shen, Junyi Liu
arXiv:2606. 25197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning effective policies for adaptive data acquisition remains challenging: posterior-based methods rely on surrogate models and posterior approximations that can be misspecified or biased, while direct policy-learning methods map from historical observations and fail to exploit available model representations, making learning harder.
By Daolang Huang, Zhuoyue Huang, Conor Hassan, Luigi Acerbi, Samuel Kaski, Tom Rainforth
arXiv:2607. 08590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific experiments are often designed to maximize information gain, yet in many applications the primary objective is to support reliable downstream decision-making.
By Haripriya Harikumar, Sammie Katt, Yasir Zubayr Barlas, Samuel Kaski
arXiv:2602.01898v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: In many experimental settings, active learning can improve sample efficiency by sequentially selecting where to measure, which is particularly valu...
By Sanna Jarl, Jens Sj\"olund, Jonathan J. S. Scragg, Maria B{\aa}nkestad
arXiv:2601. 07094v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) iteratively fits a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate to accumulated evaluations and selects new queries via an acquisition function.
By Jiguang Li, Hengrui Luo
arXiv:2506. 24007v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This study investigates minimax and Bayes optimal strategies for fixed-budget best-arm identification.
By Masahiro Kato
arXiv:2606. 07841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Black-box variational inference (BBVI) is a methodology for posterior approximation that relies on stochastic optimization.
By Trevor Campbell, Jonathan H. Huggins, Kyurae Kim, Charles C. Margossian
arXiv:2506. 03062v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A/B tests in online experiments face statistical power challenges when testing multiple candidates simultaneously, while adaptive experimental designs (AED) alone fall short in inferring experiment statistics such as the average treatment effect, especially with many metrics (e.
By Qining Zhang, Tanner Fiez, Yi Liu, Wenyang Liu