arXiv AI

KnowHal: A Knowledge-Driven Benchmark for Comprehensive Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation

arXiv:2608. 03782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hallucination remains a critical challenge for developing trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations

The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.

By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 14

Mitigating Visual Hallucinations in Multimodal Systems through Retrieval-Augmented Reliability-Aware Inference

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-language understanding and natural-language response generation. However, these systems can still produce overconfident predictions and hallucination-like outputs, particularly when the visual evidence is weak, ambiguous, or semantically inconsistent.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Overview of SHROOM-Visions 2026: A Shared Task on Hallucination Detection in Large Vision-Language Models

In 2026, the SHROOM-Visions shared task was launched at the UncertaiNLP Workshop co‑located with EMNLP to address hallucinations in large vision‑language models. The task builds on the SHEEP dataset and asks participants to detect and classify fine‑grained hallucination spans in image‑conditioned text generation across four languages (Chinese, English, French, Italian) using a five‑class taxonomy. The competition attracted 27 teams and over 600 system submissions, with top systems achieving character‑level, label‑conditioned, and IoU scores of 0.58, 0.46, and 0.51 respectively, surpassing baselines by 30‑40 points.

By Ra\'ul V\'azquez, Aman Sinha, Chuyuan Li, Claudio Savelli, Eduardo Cal\`o, Emilio Raimond, Stella Frank, Hengyu Luo, Flavio Giobergia, Vincent Segonne, Lorenzo Vaiani, J\"org Tiedemann, Timothee Mickus
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Does Playing it Safe Count as Faithfulness? Reassessing LVLM Hallucination Mitigation Methods

The paper examines six inference-time hallucination mitigation methods applied to three large vision-language models across four benchmarks, including MMStar. It finds that reducing hallucination rates often comes at the cost of lower informativeness—such as decreased object recall, visual coverage, and response detail—and that gains on hallucination benchmarks do not consistently translate to improved performance on fine-grained perception and reasoning tasks. The authors argue that current evaluation protocols may overstate progress by favoring conservative generation, and propose that hallucination mitigation should be assessed as a trade-off among faithfulness, informativeness, and overall capability.

By Mehrdad Fazli, Sina Mansouri, Mohit Marvania, Ziwei Zhu
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

arXiv:2603. 21693v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings.

By Mohammad Asadi, Tahoura Nedaee, Jack W. O'Sullivan, Euan Ashley, Ehsan Adeli
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Almieyar-Oryx-BloomBench: A Bilingual Multimodal Benchmark for Cognitively Informed Evaluation of Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2606. 05531v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the rapid progress of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), the field lacks benchmarks that rigorously diagnose their true reasoning abilities and chart meaningful progress toward human-like multimodal intelligence.

By Mohammad Mahdi Abootorabi, Omid Ghahroodi, Anas Madkoor, Marzia Nouri, Doratossadat Dastgheib, Mohamed Hefeeda, Ehsaneddin Asgari