arXiv AI

Rethinking LoRA Initialization for Robust Asymmetric Learning Rates

arXiv:2610. 32142v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is often highly sensitive to learning-rate (LR) choices.

arXiv AI
Jun 12

The Hidden Power of Scaling Factor in LoRA Optimization

arXiv:2606. 12883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), the scaling factor $\alpha$ is often treated as a mere complement to the learning rate, yet its role in optimization remains poorly understood.

By Zicheng Zhang, Haoran Li, Jiaxing Wang, Guoqiang Gong, Anqi Li, Yudong Hu, Ting Xiong, Yurong Gao, Junxing Hu, Zhida Jiang, Yifeng Zhang, Pengzhang Liu, Qixia Jiang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27

On the Convergence of Stochastic Low-Rank Adaptation

arXiv:2607. 21975v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) optimizes $J(B,A)=\mathcal L(W_\mathrm{base}+sBA)$ over two adapters $B \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times r}$ and $A \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times n}$ that form a low-rank update to a frozen pretrained weight matrix $W_\mathrm{base} \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$.

By Ru Wang, Chengchang Liu, John C. S. Lui
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

LoRA-TSD: Tangent-Space Spectral Descent for LoRA via Muon-Style Updates

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is the standard way to fine-tune large models, yet when its two factors are trained independently, the update ignores the geometry of the low-rank weight change it induces. We introduce LoRA-TSD, an optimizer that treats every LoRA step as a tangent vector of the fixed-rank matrix manifold and takes the spectral-norm steepest-descent step of Muon inside that tangent space, mapping the result back to the factors through a retraction native to the LoRA parametrization.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

Activation Boundary Matching: Task-Informed Initialization for Low-Rank Adaptation

The paper introduces Activation Boundary Matching for Low‑Rank Adaptation (ABM‑LoRA), a task‑informed initialization strategy that uses the signs of layer‑wise pre‑activations from a brief probe adapter as targets for a fresh adapter. By training with a margin‑based hinge objective on these activation boundaries, ABM‑LoRA captures useful adaptation directions that standard LoRA initializers miss, while requiring only a few forward passes. Experiments show that ABM‑LoRA outperforms or matches existing LoRA, SVD, and gradient‑based initializers across multiple models and benchmarks, including T5‑base/GLUE, ConvNeXt‑T, Swin‑T, Qwen2.5‑1.5B, and LLaMA2‑7B.

By Dongha Lee, Jinhee Park, Minjun Kim, Junseok Kwon
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 11

The Hidden Power of Scaling Factor in LoRA Optimization

In Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), the scaling factor $α$ is often treated as a mere complement to the learning rate, yet its role in optimization remains poorly understood. In this paper, we reveal that the scaling factor $α$ and the learning rate function differently, with $α$ emerging as the dominant driver of effective optimization, delivering gains that cannot be replicated by learning rate scaling alone.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

A Categorical Atlas of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning: Cones, Orbits, and Gauges

The paper presents a comprehensive framework for comparing parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning (PEFT) methods by treating each as a smooth map from a small parameter space into weight space, with a pretrained checkpoint as the base point. It identifies three key invariants—image near the base point, fibre dynamics, and base change—that explain expressivity, training dynamics, and initialization behavior. The authors prove numerous results about common PEFT techniques (e.g., LoRA, Householder adaptation) and classify 382 methods from 138 papers using seven coordinate descriptors.

By Xiaoyu Li, Zhizhou Sha, Chiwun Yang, Dai Shi