arXiv:2608.21402v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: World action models (WAMs) jointly denoise future video frames and robot actions, and the video prior is expected to generalize their control. Camera...
By Bingqi Huang, Bingchuan Wei, Yingkai Cai, Zhaokui Wang
arXiv:2605. 21862v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Chunked vision-language-action (VLA) policies predict multi-step robot controls, conditioning each update on the current visual observation alone.
By Chushan Zhang, Ruihan Lu, Jinguang Tong, Xuesong Li, Yikai Wang, Hongdong Li
The paper introduces RePlanMem-VLA, a selective visual memory system for Vision‑Language‑Action models that uses a policy’s own plan revisions as an online memory‑write signal. By detecting unusually large disagreements between temporally aligned action predictions, the method identifies task‑relevant events and updates a bounded visual memory while suppressing redundant frames. Experiments on MIKASA‑Robo‑VLA tasks and real‑robot replay data show that RePlanMem‑VLA retains essential observations in every episode and achieves high ROC‑AUC scores for event detection.
By Victoria Smelova, Daniil Kazachkov, Georgiy Kazantsev, Iuliia Tsvetkova, Egor Cherepanov, Nikita Kachaev, Artem Latyshev, Aleksandr I. Panov, Alexey K. Kovalev
ForeAct3D is a framework that grounds future world modeling in Vision‑Language‑Action policies by decoding depth, semantic segmentation, and camera pose from policy representations into current and future 3D scene states. The future queries are conditioned on the policy‑generated action chunk, and a physical‑consistency closure enforces background staticity, instance‑level rigidity, and wrist‑camera pose alignment with end‑effector kinematics. This approach eliminates the need for future prediction at inference and achieves high success rates on LIBERO and CALVIN, outperforming the base policy across all suites.
By Zhe Tao, Feiran Wang, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Yan Yan
The study examines how different vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies execute a manipulation task by comparing the geometry of their end‑effectors across 15,000 closed‑loop LIBERO rollouts. By pairing 3,600 configuration‑matched policy executions, the authors find that when both policies succeed, their end‑effector trajectories are much closer (median DTW distance 0.0120 m) than when only one succeeds (0.0380 m), a pattern consistent across all tasks, policy pairs, and nine representations. Even successful executions remain as far from same‑task demonstrations as the demonstrations are from each other, indicating that task‑associated geometry, rather than training data overlap, drives these differences.
By Xingyu Lin, Zhuang Li, Zhongrun Wu, Shouquan Zhou, Dehui Du
arXiv:2610.02323v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Flow-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies generate action chunks by transporting samples from a task-agnostic isotropic Gaussian source. As th...
By Jie He, Wei Li, Junwen Tong, Rui Shao, Wei-Shi Zheng, Liqiang Nie
CST‑WM is a causally structured world model designed for embodied visual tracking, where a robot must keep a moving target visible and recover it after occlusion or drift. The model separates state into target‑evidence, robot, and observation branches, removing direct action‑to‑target‑evidence edges to prevent causal hallucination and instead letting actions influence evidence through robot motion and resulting views. Evaluated on EVT‑Bench, Habitat 3.0, and real‑world trials with a Unitree Go2 quadruped, CST‑WM outperforms reactive trackers and other world‑model baselines in following, distance control, safety, and re‑acquisition, achieving 20 of 30 successful real‑world recoveries versus 14 for TrackVLA.
By Junyi Hu, Shuaihang Yuan, Jiazhao Liang, Yi Fang
arXiv:2610.29246v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Predictive representations for robot manipulation should connect scene geometry with the state changes induced by actions. Our intuition is that unde...
By Xiujian Liang, Liuyuan Na, Zehao Du, Jiacheng Xu, Weixi Song, Mingyang Sun, Xingjun Ma, Cewu Lu, Jianhua Sun
arXiv:2609.25558v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language-action policies benefit from geometric supervision, but current-frame geometry alone does not explicitly describe the changes associa...
By Jinu Pahk, Jesoon Kang, Taegeon Park, Jisu An, Soo Min Kimm, Jaejoon Kim, Byoung-Tak Zhang
arXiv:2610.09940v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) predict masked or future observations in representation space, offering a natural source of predicti...
By Yuchen Zhu, Chenyi Xu, Yulin Zhang, Gang Xu, Wentao Zhu
LPA-CWM introduces a Learned Physical Adjudicator (LPA) to improve counterfactual world models (CWM) for motion reasoning by learning to weight candidate responses based on visual context and response structure. The 3.0M‑parameter LPA is trained on dense MOVi‑F trajectories while keeping the CWM predictor and intervention generator frozen. A new Completeness‑aware Motion Correspondence (CMC) protocol evaluates localization, trajectory completeness, visibility, and continuity, and LPA‑CWM achieves significant gains on DAVIS and Kinetics subsets.
By Kunwei Wu, Xiang Liu, Guocai Yao, Junming Chen, Zhikang Chen, Min Zhang, Pengwei Wang, Sen Cui
ForeTime‑VLA is a causal vision‑language‑action policy that distills future‑aware representations from a frozen Fast‑WAM teacher, enabling it to anticipate contact events during conveyor‑belt manipulation. The method compresses current and future video latents into a 64‑dimensional target, uses an eight‑frame history encoder to predict this target along with manipulation phase and time‑to‑transition, and conditions a VLM prefix on future tokens and phase. On a deduplicated conveyor‑belt dataset, ForeTime‑VLA reduces test MAE by 2.63% and L2 by 3.02%, while real‑robot experiments show significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the next‑best reference.
whyItMatters":"The approach demonstrates that distilling future‑token knowledge from a world‑action model can improve dynamic manipulation performance without the computational cost of running the teacher at inference time."
By Siyuan Ma, Yutian Zhang, Boshi Zhang, Qinglian Wu, Jiaqi Zhai, Dong Wei, Xiaojin Huang