arXiv:2606. 12025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Finite element (FE) modeling of safety-critical infrastructure such as bridge barriers requires high-fidelity nonlinear dynamic analysis, yet the current FE modeling process remains labor-intensive and lacks automation.
By Quankai Wang, Yulin Xie, Tongfei Yang, Minghui Cheng, Ran Cao
arXiv:2608.21976v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic AI has automated parts of scientific discovery, including paper generation, expert-level coding, therapeutic proposal, and autonomous experimen...
By Tianyi Yu, Chengxing Tao, Haoxuan Shen, Huiyang Li, Rugang Chen, Long Teng, Lilin Wang, Yan Li, Qingbin Chen, Chaogang Xu, Lizhong Wang
arXiv:2606. 01385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Software architecture design is a critical yet inherently complex and knowledge-intensive phase that requires balancing competing quality attributes and adapting to evolving requirements.
By Ruiyin Li, Yiran Zhang, Xiyu Zhou, Yangxiao Cai, Peng Liang, Weisong Sun, Jifeng Xuan, Zhi Jin, Yang Liu
arXiv:2606. 00138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Finite element analysis (FEA) is the most important numerical approach for solid mechanics.
By Titu Ranjan Sarker, Muhammed Jawaad Zulqernine, Ling Yue, Shaowu Pan, Chenxi Wang, Shiyao Lin
AI for Research (AI4Research) leverages AI to automate and improve scientific workflows. While experimental design is a critical stage of the research process, prior work has focused primarily on code implementation and execution, overlooking the importance of this stage, and no benchmark exists to evaluate AI's ability to conduct systematic experiment design.
arXiv:2606. 17577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-driven engineering workflows face particular challenges in crash safety design: unlike aerodynamics, crash events involve highly nonlinear contact dynamics, material nonlinearity, and discrete state transitions that are difficult to capture with data-driven surrogate models.
By Osamu Ito, Akihiko Katagiri, Yoshikazu Nakagawa, Shin Saeki, Jun Shiraishi, Masato Sasaki
arXiv:2609.36064v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Foundation models are powerful generators, but many engineering domains require structured representations that general-purpose systems handle poorly...
By Sahand Rezaei-Shoshtari, Patryk Wozniczka, Shu Ishida, Gregg Streuber, Farnoosh Javadi, Jeffrey Landes, Angela Ju, Muhammad Azam, Bryan Lim, Johan Luttun, Indrajeet Haldar, Jonathan Shaw, Beatriz Guerra, Ivan Sosnovik, James Stoddart, Robert Giaquinto, Adam Gaier
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
arXiv:2606. 09037v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study presents a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent framework for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) design optimization that mitigates limitations of conventional workflows: expertise-dependent problem setup and data preparation, the prohibitive computational cost of finite element analysis (FEA), and the unreliability of AI surrogates in unexplored regions.
By Jinseong Han, Sunwoong Yang, Namwoo Kang
arXiv:2606. 12191v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Environments serve as interactive systems for large language model (LLM) based agents across diverse scenarios and play a crucial role in driving the continual evolution of model capabilities.
By Jiachun Li, Zhuoran Jin, Tianyi Men, Yupu Hao, Kejian Zhu, Lingshuai Wang, Dongqi Huang, Longxiang Wang, Shengjia Hua, Lu Wang, Jinshan Gao, Hongbang Yuan, Ruilin Xu, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
arXiv:2609.37172v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for automated heuristic design (AHD), enabling iterative generation and refinement of heuri...
By Jianghan Zhu, Cong Zhang, Rongjie Zhu, Chi Zhang, Zhiguang Cao
TO-Agents is a multi‑agent AI framework that translates natural‑language design intent into iterative topology optimization. It converts a human problem description into solver inputs, runs the optimizer, renders 3D topologies, and employs a judge agent to critique and revise results using multiview vision‑language reasoning. Evaluated on a cantilever beam and a phone‑stand design, the system achieved preference‑aligned designs in 60% of trials, outperforming an ablated pipeline by up to six times and enabling end‑to‑end intent‑to‑prototype design with additive manufacturing.
By Isabella A. Stewart, Hongrui Chen, Faez Ahmed