The paper introduces TRACE, a method that removes duplicated text—known as note bloat—from clinical notes by leveraging EHR metadata and frequency-based de‑duplication. Across 5.3 million notes from diverse patient cohorts, TRACE eliminated 47.3 % of chart text while preserving information extraction and prediction performance, with only 0.3–6.6 % of removed content being author‑generated. The authors project that applying TRACE could yield net savings of $1.00 M to $13.58 M over three years at a large academic center, depending on model pricing schemes.
By Jordan L. Cahoon, Chloe Stanwyck, Asad Aali, Rachel Madding, Sulaiman S. Somani, Emma Sun, Yixing Jiang, Renumathy Dhanasekaran, Emily Alsentzer
arXiv:2607. 15380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electronic health records combine free-text clinical narratives with structured measurements such as vital signs, laboratory values, and comorbidities.
By Ajay Madhavan Ravichandran, Bilgin Osmandoja, Klemens Budde, Klaus Netter, Tobias Strapatsas, Aljoscha Burchardt, Sebastian M\"oller, Roland Roller
arXiv:2605.20292v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Numerical time-series models effectively process irregular electronic health record (EHR) trajectories, but do not expose which temporal patterns s...
By Kwanhyung Lee, Juhwan Choi, Jongheon Kim, Joohyung Lee, Hyeongwon Jang, Jeonguk Lee, Jisoo Jung, Eunho Yang
MultiSigBERT is a unified framework that performs multimodal sequential survival modeling in oncology by integrating narrative clinical reports, numerical measurements, and structured variables. The method converts free-text reports into sentence embeddings, compresses them with modality-specific PCA, and concatenates them with structured covariates to create joint temporal trajectories. These trajectories are encoded using the Signature transform from Rough Paths theory, and the resulting high-dimensional features are fed into a LASSO-regularized Cox model, achieving a concordance index of 0.743 on an independent test set of over 2,500 patients.
By Paul Minchella, St\'ephane Chr\'etien, Guillaume Metzler, Lo\"ic Verlingue, R\'emi Vaucher
arXiv:2607. 15447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent research in clinical machine learning, focusing on outcome predictions in intensive care unit (ICU), has shifted from bespoke supervised models to foundation models, utilising modern representation learning methods.
By Jingteng Li, Alexander Capstick, Louise Rigny, Iona Biggart, Neil J Sebire, Payam Barnaghi
arXiv:2609.15713v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent approaches to 30-day hospital readmission prediction rely on pre-trained language models applied to discharge summaries. Although these methods...
By Mohamad Najafi, Hongyun Fu, Mathias Brochhausen, Jian Wu, Yaohang Li
arXiv:2606. 28798v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: ICD codes are central to reimbursement, research, and population health surveillance, yet automated coding systems often struggle to integrate diagnostic signals from both clinical narratives and structured electronic health record (EHR) variables.
By Chengyuan Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Yao Li, Guanting Chen
arXiv:2608. 14157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanical ventilation is a critical life-support intervention, requiring dynamic adjustments to ventilator settings as a patient's condition evolves.
By Chenran Weng, Joo Seung Lee, Malini Mahendra, Anil Aswani
arXiv:2606.28798v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The main objective of this paper is to propose a general framework for prediction based on different sources of multimodal data in the healthcare d...
By Chengyuan Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Yao Li, Guanting Chen
The study evaluates large language models (LLMs) on sequential emergency department triage, where acuity labels are predicted from progressively longer nurse‑patient conversations. Six LLMs were tested at five checkpoints on simulated and physician‑authored dialogues, showing a decline from moderate‑to‑substantial agreement on full records to only fair‑to‑moderate agreement at each checkpoint. The models consistently anchor on chief complaint exchanges and fail to integrate later evidence, yielding low agreement with clinicians (QWK 0.295 vs. 0.887‑0.929) and concentrating predictions on ESI‑2 and ESI‑3.
whyItMatters":"The findings reveal that LLMs, despite strong offline performance, cannot reliably handle the sequential nature of real‑time triage, highlighting a critical gap for safe deployment in emergency settings."
By Dipankar Srirag, Haokai Zhao, Ashutosh Kumar, Eleanor Hopper, Michael Dalton, Quoc Dung Nguyen, Aditya Joshi, Salil S. Kanhere, Padmanesan Narasimhan
arXiv:2608. 16594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cancer survival prediction supports treatment planning, risk stratification, and follow-up management.
By Tianqi Xiang, Qixiang Zhang, Xinpeng Ding, Yi Li, Xiaomeng Li
The study evaluates AI-generated summaries for cancer patients using a dual assessment framework that includes human experts and LLM-as-a-judge. Human domain experts—oncology clinicians and patient-facing care staff—assess summary quality on accuracy, clinical relevance, and readability. The research identifies limitations such as omissions and minor inaccuracies, which are then used to iteratively refine prompts, grounding, and safety guardrails.
By Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmad, Kim Shyu, Leon Oliver, Fergus Sleight, Paul Landau