arXiv:2606. 01566v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Small-to-medium scientific datasets place machine learning pipelines under two compounding pressures.
By Amanda S Barnard
arXiv:2607. 07060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly.
By Srikumar Krishnamoorthy
arXiv:2606. 29280v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We identify intervention bias as a previously unquantified failure mode of zero-shot large-language-model (LLM) educational advisory agents: without task-specific training, they recommend action when a hindsight-optimal oracle policy mandates inaction.
By Craig Atkinson
arXiv:2608. 16926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data selection in supervised fine-tuning aims to select a small set of effective samples from large-scale candidate data, reducing training cost while preserving model performance.
By Peng Sun, Yi Yang, Antong Zhang, Chunxiao Li, Yanbo Wang, Dianbo Liu, xin chen, Kai Yu, Lu Chen, Tianfan Fu
arXiv:2607. 18278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Calibration is usually evaluated in aggregate, but the most dangerous failures are often local: predictions that remain highly confident despite being wrong.
By Filippo Cenacchi, Longbing Cao, Runze Yang
arXiv:2607. 11969v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Point-adjustment (PA), long the default scoring protocol in time-series anomaly detection (TSAD), was shown by Kim et al.
By Zongye Lyu
arXiv:2607. 20046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical domains, reducing the cost of model validation under limited testing budgets has become increasingly important.
By Chunyu Liu, Mingyuan Li, Yang Li, Wenmin Li, Fei Gao, Tengfei Tu, Su-Juan Qin
arXiv:2606. 17660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is compute-intensive and error-prone: model performance depends sensitively on data quality and hyperparameter choices, and na\"ive runs can even degrade model performance.
By Yuxiang Luo, Haonan Long, Chen Wang, Qiqi Duan, Xiaotian Lin, Yanwei Xu, Yuyu Luo, Weikai Yang, Nan Tang
Inherently interpretable classifiers for tabular data typically rely on sparse features, rules, or patterns that users can inspect directly. The marginal feature-screening step common to these methods can discard variables whose predictive value emerges only through joint configurations with other variables.
arXiv:2608. 13190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group-robust learning is crucial for maintaining accuracy on rare subpopulations when training-group labels are unavailable.
By Qianqian Wang, Yunshan Li, Dawei Huang, Wenwu Gong, Lili Yang
arXiv:2607. 18515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study contributes toward development of an Automated Data Processing (ADP) framework designed to evaluate and reinforce optimal machine learning model-feature combinations for predictive tasks in fused deposition modeling (FDM) process datasets.
By Saleh Valizadeh Sotubadi, Nazanin Mahjourian, Vinh Nguyen
arXiv:2607. 00958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series are central to modern data mining applications, from industrial telemetry and server metrics to finance and physiology, yet time-series self-supervised learning often depends on view and augmentation choices that encode domain-specific invariances.
By Alexander Chemeris, Ming Jin, Randall Balestriero