arXiv AI

Measuring Consensus in AI Agent Networks

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

AI agents reshape consensus formation in human groups

The study investigates how large language model (LLM) agents influence consensus formation in mixed human‑AI groups during a collaborative description game. Three regimes emerge: low agent proportions lead to human‑led consensus, intermediate proportions disrupt convergence, and high proportions produce strong, agent‑led consensus. The resulting consensus differs in semantic grounding and communicative form, with human‑led consensus being concrete and holistic, and agent‑led consensus being abstract and geometrically segmented.

By Lin Chen, Ziyi Liu, Xia Hu, Yong Li
arXiv AI
6d ago

TeamGym: A Gym for Team Decision-Making by AI Agents with Distributed Information

TeamGym is a new environment that evaluates and trains language‑model agents on team decision‑making tasks drawn from real‑world legal, finance, medical, and software engineering texts. It introduces the concept of pivotal information—a minimal set of facts necessary for a correct decision—and tracks how agents share and retrieve this information. Experiments show that distributing pivotal facts and requiring agents to extract them independently significantly reduces success rates, but reinforcement‑learning training can improve decision quality and foster coordination among team members.

By Chanwoo Park, Jaywoong Jeong, Zachary Wojtowicz, Yubin Kim, Taekyun Lee, Kaiqing Zhang, Asuman Ozdaglar
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Consilience: Conformally Calibrated Communication Control for Hidden-Profile Multi-Agent Reasoning

Consilience is an inference‑time orchestration framework that steers and certifies communication among multi‑agent large language models in hidden‑profile settings. It summarizes each discussion turn with a compact state of uncertainty, disagreement, evidence gain, redundancy, and premature consensus, then selects a communication intervention (challenge, clarify, seek evidence, or route) and speaker. A round‑wise conformal calibration procedure guarantees that the controller’s proposed action has bounded one‑step regret with high probability, and an acceptance mechanism enforces this guarantee for the executed action. Experiments on HiddenBench‑style tasks show that Consilience improves decision accuracy and communication efficiency over fixed and unstructured protocols, sometimes outperforming a full‑information baseline.

By Abhijith Babu, Ramneet Kaur, Vishal Pramanik, Olivera Kotevska, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Susmit Jha, Sunny Raj, Yanzhao Wu, Sumit Kumar Jha, Anirban Roy
arXiv AI
Oct 1

CollabFlow: Recursive Self-Improvement of Agent Collaboration

CollabFlow introduces a recursive self‑improvement framework for multi‑agent collaboration in large language model systems. It trains a Collab‑Director to assemble teams of agents, uses a frozen executor to run them, and retrains the director each round based on outcomes. The system incorporates evidence‑conditioned communication protocols within collaboration graphs and a Collaborative Trajectory Balance objective to maintain diverse high‑performing teams across rounds, achieving superior performance on twelve datasets.

By Xiao Huang, Mingda Zhang, Junming Zhang, Qiang Huang, Hanwen Zhang, Yue Dai, Zijia Wang, Xiaoying Tang
arXiv AI
Aug 28

SIGMA: Structured Noise-Effect-Aware Grouped Multi-Agent Aggregation

SIGMA is a hierarchical framework for cooperative multi‑agent reinforcement learning that addresses structured noise effects—local correlations in noise-induced decision impacts among agents with strong task dependencies. It groups agents into adaptive local structures using density‑based clustering, aggregates intra‑group representations to smooth deviations, and then applies inter‑group attention to integrate information while respecting heterogeneous contributions. Experiments on noisy‑observation StarCraft II tasks confirm that SIGMA improves robustness to observation noise without sacrificing performance in clean environments.

By Li Mingqian
Hugging Face Trending Papers
6d ago

Test-Time Communication in Trading Agent Swarms

The paper investigates how communication affects trading agents that operate independently rather than as a coordinated team. Over seven trading days, 200 agents from four model families were grouped under five communication regimes, from isolation to shared message boards, and their reading logs were recorded before each decision. Results showed that in two model families, communicating groups held more of the same stocks than isolated groups, and a group’s return was largely driven by shared holdings; agents were more likely to reuse phrases from groupmates, and communicating groups tended to sell in step more often than isolated ones, though isolated groups also converged on similar stocks, indicating that herding assessments must compare against a no‑peer baseline.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Bregman Consensus

arXiv:2609.35930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Consider a community of agents who are seeking consensus on a set of parameters. The agents agree to use the same Bregman-type divergence to quantify...

By Andrei N. Soklakov