arXiv Computer Vision

Does a Modern-Handwriting Warm-Up Help Historical Arabic OCR? A Reproducible, Compute-Matched Evaluation on Muharaf and KHATT

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

RefLAM: A Reference-Grounded Line Annotation Pipeline for Historical Arabic Manuscripts

RefLAM is a pipeline that converts manuscript page images and clean transcriptions into validated, line-level ground truth for Arabic handwritten text recognition. It combines a deep‑learning page‑segmentation model, a multimodal large language model for structured OCR, and a diacritic‑agnostic fuzzy alignment engine that assigns a confidence score to each line, with a provable correctness guarantee for perfect scores. Using RefLAM, the authors achieved a 75× speedup over manual annotation and released AraMS‑28k, a dataset of 14 historical Arabic manuscripts with detailed annotations.

By Mohamed Guechaoui, Mohamed Diaa Zellagui, Souleyman Chaib, Sahraoui Dhelim
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

AraMS-28k: The Largest Publicly Released Line-Level Dataset of Historical Arabic Manuscripts with Margin and Insertion-Anchor Annotations

AraMS-28k is the largest publicly released line‑level dataset of genuine historical Arabic manuscripts, containing 14 books, 3,043 pages, and 28,600 annotated text lines (27,971 main‑text and 629 margin). The dataset spans three script traditions—Naskh, Ruq'ah, and Maghrebi—and includes a lithographed printed edition for format diversity. Each line is labeled as main‑text or margin, with margin lines that have a clear attachment point annotated with an insertion anchor to recover the manuscript’s true non‑linear reading order; both fully vocalized and diacritic‑normalized transcriptions are provided, and the data was produced via the RefLAM pipeline combining OCR, clean transcriptions, and human review. "whyItMatters":"The dataset’s comprehensive line‑level annotations, including reading‑order anchors and dual transcription formats, enable reproducible research on Arabic manuscript recognition, layout analysis, and reading‑order recovery under a CC BY‑NC‑SA 4.0 license."

By Mohamed Guechaoui, Mohamed Diaa Zellagui, Souleyman Chaib, Sahraoui Dhelim
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Unadapted Multilingual ASR on a Garrusi Kurdish Evaluation Set: A Common-Reference Staged Normalization Analysis

The paper evaluates a multilingual ASR model (MMS‑1B‑all) on a Garrusi Kurdish dataset using a common‑reference staged normalization approach. By normalizing both reference and hypothesis, the authors show that raw Arabic‑script hypotheses yield a 111.70 % WER, which drops to 97.85 % after folding into a reduced orthography, highlighting the impact of orthographic differences on error measurement. A Southern Kurdish fine‑tuned system performs worse, and residual errors are partly due to scoring‑pipeline limitations rather than recognition failures.

By Hiwa Asadpour
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14

What Counts as a Mistake? Annotating Recitation Events in Quran Memorization Transcripts

The paper presents a human‑annotated dataset of 100 Quran recitation recordings, identifying 348 scored units and 162 localized events across ten combined labels. An evaluator that scores both labels and word positions achieves a label‑aware F1 of 0.525 and a localization F1 of 0.826, with adapted production cleaner/alignment components yielding similar scores. A pilot experiment with eight 20‑minute runs across three coders and eight models shows wide variance in F1 (0.143–0.892) and highlights that most gold events are detected, leaving only span extent and label conventions as the remaining challenges.

By Mohamad Al Mdfaa, Nursultan Askarbekuly, Ahmed Helaly, Ubai Sandouk, Manuel Mazzara
arXiv AI
Sep 4

How Far Can Synthetic Data Take Thai OCR?

The paper explores how synthetic data can be used to train a Thai OCR model without real OCR labels. By systematically varying factors such as typeface diversity, page structure, and handwriting glyphs, the authors identify which aspects of realism most improve transfer to real documents. Using these insights, they adapt a large PaddleOCR model into Wayu‑Paxa‑OCR‑Zero, achieving a median character error rate of 1.24% on printed pages and 20.55% on handwriting, outperforming existing Thai OCR systems.

By Kunat Pipatanakul