arXiv Computation and Language

PEDBench: Can Speech Models Detect Phonetic Errors?

PEDBench is a new benchmark for phonetic error detection (PED) that includes natural recordings of children’s speech errors, scripted error productions by actors, and synthetic error productions generated via phone‑conditioned text‑to‑speech. The benchmark provides high‑quality phonetic annotations verified by trained annotators. Evaluation of 13 state‑of‑the‑art speech models shows that they struggle to reliably detect phonetic errors, even in controlled conditions, and often misclassify correct phonemes as errors. Fine‑tuned speech‑language models perform better on word‑level PED, but a sim‑to‑real domain gap persists.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

An Empirical Recipe for Universal Phone Recognition

arXiv:2603. 29042v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Phone recognition (PR) is a key enabler of multilingual and low-resource speech processing tasks, yet robust performance remains elusive.

By Shikhar Bharadwaj, Chin-Jou Li, Kwanghee Choi, Eunjung Yeo, William Chen, Shinji Watanabe, David R. Mortensen
arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

SITAR: A Situational Distortion Metric for Automatic Speech Recognition Evaluation

The paper introduces SITAR, a situational distortion metric for evaluating automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems. SITAR aggregates situational severity and cumulative extent into a unified score using a bounded recursive formulation, and is implemented as a lightweight BERT-family regressor that requires minimal runtime cost. The authors validate SITAR through extrinsic and intrinsic protocols, showing it tracks capability scaling and provides diagnostic utility across diverse datasets and models.

By Mingzhe Lu, Jinhao Liu, Yunpeng Li, Hang Su, Lichun Fan, Jian Luan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 23

Phoneme-Level Mispronunciation Screening in Polish-Speaking Children with an Explainable Assistant

Early identification of speech sound errors in children is often limited by access to specialists, motivating lightweight screening tools that can operate outside the clinic. We present a screening pipeline for Polish-speaking children focused on sibilant substitutions, coupling a wav2vec2-based CTC token recognizer with alignment-based error typing and a template-grounded caregiver assistant for screening, not diagnosis.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Error Rate is Not Enough: Costs of Augmentation in Low-Resource ASR

The paper examines how different data‑augmentation techniques affect low‑resource automatic speech recognition beyond overall error rates. It compares speed perturbation, SpecAugment, and two text‑based audio synthesis methods across four low‑resource languages and English, analyzing phoneme‑level errors. The study finds that SpecAugment improves aggregate performance but increases tone and palatalization errors, while text‑based methods introduce consonant insertions; when combined, each method mitigates the other's weaknesses, yielding superadditive gains that diminish as data size grows to 100 hours.

By Katsumi Ibaraki, David Chiang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

PTC-Bias: Phoneme-Level Temporal Competition for Bias Retrieval and Post-Decoding Correction in Speech LLMs

PTC-Bias is a two-stage framework that improves contextual biasing in speech large language models by using phoneme-level temporal competition. In the first stage, PTC Retrieval performs frame-synchronous phoneme decoding to generate a compact shortlist of bias words and their speech intervals. The second stage, PTC Correction, applies a local competition between retrieved candidates and mismatched transcript spans within those intervals, reducing near-homophone and word-segmentation errors without extra SpeechLLM passes. Experiments on LibriSpeech demonstrate consistent gains across two SpeechLLMs, with PTC-Bias reducing B-WER by up to 23.9% relative to CTC-Filter while keeping U-WER nearly unchanged.

By Zhiqi Ai, Han Cheng, Shiyi Mu, Yongjin Zhou, Shugong Xu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Evaluating Bias in Phoneme-Based Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: An Analysis of IPA Transcription Models

The paper evaluates bias in phoneme-based automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems, focusing on WhisperIPA and ZIPA, which produce International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcriptions. Using multilingual speech corpora and demographically annotated English datasets, the authors compare model-generated IPA against grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) outputs with both standard phoneme error rate (PER) and a new Soft PER metric that allows linguistically similar substitutions. The study finds persistent disparities across language, gender, accent, ethnicity, and age, even when accounting for acceptable phonemic variation.

By Maneesha Rani Saha, Catherine Bao, Neal Patwari