arXiv AI

PIDS-Bench: Evaluating Prompt-Injection Detectors Under Over-Defense, Obfuscation, and Distribution Shift

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

How Benchmarks and Evaluation Protocols Shape Conclusions in Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection

arXiv:2608. 01454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Provenance-based intrusion detection systems (PIDS) frequently report strong performance, but the conclusions drawn from these results can be highly sensitive to benchmarking choices and evaluation protocols.

By Lorenzo Guerra, Thomas Chapuis, Guillaume Duc, Pavlo Mozharovskyi, Van-Tam Nguyen
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Beyond F1: Evaluating Coverage and Failure Recovery in AI Model Security Scanners

The paper evaluates three AI model security scanners—ModelScan, ModelAudit, and Fickling—using a benchmark of 170 Pickle and PyTorch artifacts from 145 families, 135 of which have binary security labels. It distinguishes coverage metrics such as non‑N/A coverage, analysis completion, and definitive security decisions, finding that ModelAudit achieved 100% definitive decisions, Fickling 81.5%, and ModelScan 49.6%. When a definitive judgment was made, ModelScan reached perfect precision, recall, and F1, while Fickling added no unique true positives beyond those found by the other tools.

By Qianlong Lan, Vinothini Pandurangan, Anuj Kaul, Indranil Sanyal
arXiv AI
Aug 28

The Latent Diagnostic Taxonomy: A Framework for Constructing Classifiers and Diagnosing Their Decisions, Applied to Prompt Injection Detection

The paper introduces the Latent Diagnostic Taxonomy, a framework that builds a dimensionality‑optimized classifier and a diagnostic tool to assess the trustworthiness of its confident predictions. It identifies a small set of influential prompts (latent support vectors) that reveal tokens which can change the classifier’s output, and uses these tokens to create a taxonomy that classifies prompts into safe, heuristic bias, heuristic override, or insufficient context categories. Applied to a prompt‑injection detection model, the framework shows that about 77% of confident decisions are fragile to a single token, distinguishing between calibration failures and exploitable shortcuts, and offers remediation strategies for each taxonomy zone.

By Jaturong Kongmanee, Smile Thanapattheerakul