The paper introduces RefineCut, an open‑weight planner that edits a typed video timeline by applying structured patches for clip selection, trimming, ordering, transitions, music alignment, and duration. A deterministic verifier checks each patch against an explicit constraint ledger, and the planner is trained via verifier‑replayed distillation and a second evolutionary stage (RefineCut‑Evo) that uses the verifier and a task rubric to generate high‑margin preference pairs. On the RefineCut‑Bench dataset, the 8‑billion‑parameter planner improves from a Video‑Editing Score of 0.620 to 0.924, matching or exceeding its frontier teachers in a closed verifier loop, and the gains transfer to other large models such as Llama‑3.1‑8B and GLM‑4‑9B.
arXiv:2608. 02694v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-horizon video editing agents receive final-product feedback only after many interdependent decisions.
The study demonstrates that governance records—structured logs linking task contracts, model attempts, verifier decisions, and outputs—can serve as effective supervision for bounded AI models. Using a verifier-selected self‑training approach, the authors show that a Qwen3‑14B model trained on plans accepted by an independent VAL verifier achieved significant gains in plan acceptance across numerous PlanBench replanning cases, outperforming other selection strategies. The results highlight the feasibility of one‑shot execution and cumulative learning without relying on oracle targets or stronger teachers.
Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair agents inside a verifier-checked refinement loop, but the orchestrator at the centre is itself a prompted frontier LLM, paying a frontier-LLM API call at every refinement step.
arXiv:2606. 04970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We envision a proactive multi-modal assistant system which gives users real-time step-by-step guidance on a procedural task, autonomously deciding \textit{when} to interrupt, and \textit{how} to coach.
PROOF-Gen is a method that improves distillation of tool‑calling models by recovering successful trajectories from teacher failures. It uses per‑scenario prompt optimization to generate corrective guidance that steers the teacher to a passing trajectory, then removes this guidance before training so the student learns from clean demonstrations. On τ2‑bench, PROOF-Gen recovers 93% of failed scenarios, boosting Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507’s Pass^1 from 0.132 to 0.529 and improving Gemma 4 E4B‑it by 7.2pp on BFCL v4 multi‑turn, while also raising deployed on‑device model performance by up to 5.0pp across response‑quality metrics.
ACE is a self‑correcting agentic canvas editor that operates on a hierarchical scene‑graph rather than flat document formats, enabling reliable multi‑slide presentation automation. It pairs a presentation‑specialized action space of 98 tools with CARE, a content‑aware router that reduces input tokens by about 89%, and a ground‑truth‑free instruction‑following judge that feeds natural‑language critiques back into the agent for self‑correction. In benchmarks, ACE outperforms a comparable agentic HTML pipeline on instruction following (4.23 vs. 3.81), runs 1.75× faster, costs 44% less, and is preferred by 58.7% of blind raters, with 81% favoring the self‑corrected output.
arXiv:2601. 22758v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model agents repeatedly encounter related tasks, yet systems that learn from trajectories commit every lesson to one predefined artifact form.
We envision a proactive multi-modal assistant system which gives users real-time step-by-step guidance on a procedural task, autonomously deciding \textit{when} to interrupt, and \textit{how} to coach. However, progress is limited by the absence of large-scale, cross-domain benchmarks that reflect realistic conditions, particularly the common case in which users deviate from the expected step sequence.
arXiv:2608. 11318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many sequential construction tasks exhibit exact symmetry at completion while their execution remains directed and history-dependent.
arXiv:2605. 14084v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code agents must both reason over long-horizon repository state and obey strict tool-use protocols.
Commercial design platforms increasingly edit documents through large language model (LLM) agents, but two practical problems block reliable deployment: legacy document formats expose only \emph{flat}...
arXiv:2608. 05466v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality long-horizon training data for terminal agents is expensive to produce, often costing hundreds to thousands of dollars per task, because each task must keep the instruction, environment, reference solution, and verifier mutually consistent.