arXiv Machine Learning

Efficient Sequential Evaluation of Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 17409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the problem of sequentially evaluating a new large language model (LLM) on a fixed question set using historical performance data from prior LLMs.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning LLMs: Inference Regimes, Evaluation, and Reproducibility

arXiv:2608. 04001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can solve substantially harder reasoning problems with more inference-time compute.

By Mohsen Hariri, Weicong Chen, Nahal Shahini, Vikash Singh, Kai Ye, Amirhossein Samandar, Debargha Ganguly, Sreehari Sankar, Yanyan Zhang, Shouren Wang, Jerry Peng, Biyao Zhang, Michael Hinczewski, Vipin Chaudhary
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Which LLM to pick? Online Active Model Selection for Large Language Models

The paper introduces ONLINE LLM PICKER, a framework for active model selection of large language models in streaming settings. It selects the most informative prompts for annotation within a limited budget, enabling the identification of the best or near‑best model among many candidates. Experiments on 10 datasets and over 130 language models show up to 71.67% savings in annotation cost and a reduction in regret by up to 2.51× when using the chosen model for sequential generation.

By Alessandro Turrin, Patrik Okanovic, Torsten Hoefler, Nezihe Merve G\"urel
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Replacing Training with Memory: Listwise Selection for Text-to-SQL

The paper proposes a fine‑tuning‑free listwise selector for Text‑to‑SQL systems that replaces traditional learning objectives with inference‑time strategies. It introduces reusable structured memories (MaP‑SQL) that encode mappings from natural language to schema elements, SQL operations, and expected outputs, and uses these memories to evaluate candidate queries. To reduce positional bias, the method aggregates rankings across multiple input permutations, optimizing inference cost through execution results and pointwise scoring. The approach achieves higher selection accuracy, fewer unnecessary comparisons, and outperforms the prior state‑of‑the‑art R^3‑SQL on the BIRD‑dev benchmark while using fewer tokens.

By Yeonseok Jeong, Soyoung Yoon, Seongjun Lee, Seung-won Hwang