arXiv AI

FlowExtract: Procedural Knowledge Extraction from Maintenance Flowcharts

FlowExtract is a pipeline designed to convert ISO 5807-standardized maintenance flowcharts into directed graphs. It separates node detection—using YOLOv8 and EasyOCR—from connectivity reconstruction, employing a novel edge detection method that traces arrowheads back to source nodes. Evaluations on industrial troubleshooting guides show high node detection accuracy and significant improvement over vision‑language model baselines for edge extraction.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

Procedural Knowledge Extraction from Industrial Troubleshooting Guides Using Vision Language Models

The paper examines how Vision Language Models (VLMs) can automatically extract structured procedural knowledge from industrial troubleshooting guides, which are typically flowchart-like diagrams combining spatial layout and technical language. It evaluates two VLMs using two prompting strategies—standard instruction-guided and an augmented approach that highlights layout patterns—and finds that each model shows different trade-offs between sensitivity to layout and robustness to semantic content. These insights help determine which VLM and prompting method is most suitable for integrating such guides into operator support systems.

By Guillermo Gil de Avalle, Laura Maruster, Christos Emmanouilidis
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 1

TopoAgent: A Structure-Aware Perception-to-Reasoning Framework for Diagram-to-Graph Topology Extraction with Large Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces TopoBench-180, a human‑verified benchmark of 180 structural diagrams with canonical graph annotations, and TopoAgent, a perception‑to‑reasoning framework that extracts graph topology from diagrams using large vision‑language models. TopoAgent combines grounded perception, global structural priors, node inventory construction, local‑to‑global relation reasoning, and consistency enforcement to progressively build the target graph. Experiments demonstrate that TopoAgent surpasses strong baselines, particularly in edge extraction, thereby advancing multimodal structured understanding for diagram‑to‑graph tasks.

By Bangwei Guo, Xujiang Zhao, Yanchi Liu, Wei Cheng, Shengyu Chen, Dongyue Li, Masaharu Morimoto, Takayuki Kuroda, Dimitris Metaxas, Haifeng Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

Back2Struct: Making Structured Images Editable Again

Back2Struct is a system that converts structured images—such as diagrams, charts, and flowcharts—into editable vector graphics code (SVG/XML). By predicting semantically rich, object-level SVG code rather than low-level pixel vectorization, it allows the generated graphics to be imported into tools like PowerPoint for easy editing, restyling, and reuse. The model is trained with supervised fine‑tuning and reward‑based learning that enforces syntactic validity, concise length, and visual fidelity to the input, leading to higher accuracy, editability, and user alignment compared to baselines.

By Pengyu Yan, Yixin Wu, Yunjie Tian, David Doermann
arXiv AI
Aug 7

ViSR-KGC: Visual Subgraph Reasoning with Vision-Language Models for Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion

arXiv:2608. 05833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer missing entities or relations from incomplete graph structures, and has evolved into multimodal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC), where entities are associated with multiple modalities such as text and images.

By Jiafan Li, Mengxue Yang, Jiaqi Zhu, Liang Chang, Ying Li, Hongan Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

When Vision Meets Graphs: A Survey on Graph Reasoning and Learning

The survey titled "When Vision Meets Graphs: A Survey on Graph Reasoning and Learning" reviews how visual depictions of graphs can be used as inputs for graph reasoning and learning. It highlights that while Graph Neural Networks dominate graph machine learning, most pipelines ignore the visual form of graphs, despite scientists routinely interpreting graphs visually. The paper organizes existing work into three threads—vision for graph reasoning, vision for graph learning, and scientific graphs—aiming to clarify current capabilities and chart a path toward foundation models that perceive and reason about graphs like scientists do.

By Xinjian Zhao, Wei Pang, Zhixuan Yu, Xiangru Jian, Xiaozhuang Song, Yaoyao Xu, Zhongkai Xue, Dingshuo Chen, Shu Wu, Philip Torr, Tianshu Yu