The study evaluates six deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches for high‑performance computing (HPC) job scheduling, comparing Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Advantage Actor‑Critic (A2C), and Deep Q‑Network (DQN) with and without action masking. Across two real Slurm workload traces—one homogeneous and one heterogeneous—masked DRL treatments complete evaluation, while unmasked ones are truncated. On the heterogeneous trace, MaskablePPO outperforms baseline heuristics in all three metrics, achieving waiting times within 10% of the best heuristics and a 22% lower maximum bounded slowdown than Last‑Come, First‑Served (LCFS).
arXiv:2607. 11725v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction moves most building work into module factories, whose production floor operates as a flexible job shop.
arXiv:2605. 26418v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A properly calibrated rule-based autoscaler can beat every one of six mainstream deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms on cost across every workload we test - so when, if ever, does DRL actually help?
arXiv:2509. 10303v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Online reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have demonstrated strong performance on Job Shop Scheduling (JSP) and Flexible JSP (FJSP) problems by learning scheduling policies through direct interaction with simulated environments.
arXiv:2606. 04145v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud LLM fine-tuning platforms increasingly serve RLHF workloads, where a learned reward model is optimized as a proxy for human quality.
The paper investigates whether small large language model agents can operate within explicit wall‑clock time budgets while using the allotted time productively. Experiments with Qwen3.6‑27B on MLE‑Bench Lite and Qwen3‑4B on Zork I show that agents fail to translate budget statements into controlled time use, largely due to lack of timing feedback and poor anticipation of action durations. Interventions such as harness‑based timing exposure, enforcement hooks, and reinforcement learning with budget‑aware rewards improve budget adherence but do not lead to better task performance, revealing a persistent gap between respecting time limits and effectively allocating extra time.
arXiv:2608. 11152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern reinforcement learning (RL) post-training pipelines for large language models (LLMs) increasingly combine rollout workloads across multiple domains and feedback paradigms.
arXiv:2607. 17326v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transfer-oriented reinforcement learning requires evaluating algorithms along dimensions that go beyond standard sample efficiency.
The paper presents a constrained command‑conditioned Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) executor for the MicroRTS real‑time strategy environment, enabling a single execution policy to follow diverse strategic commands. A Thompson‑sampling bandit strategist selects command tuples based on in‑game observations of the opponent’s strategy, rather than relying on opponent identity. In controlled experiments, the strategist‑executor system outperforms a flat PPO baseline against three of the four strongest opponents on a training map, including two held‑out opponents, while showing no significant difference against the remaining opponents.
arXiv:2606. 19004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) is prohibitively expensive, requiring thousands of high-end GPUs.
arXiv:2606. 13682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The open shop scheduling problem (OSSP) arises in many industrial and service settings but remains computationally challenging as the number of jobs and machines increases.
The study evaluates multi-harness reinforcement learning (RL) for coding agents by training two Qwen3-8B RL variants—one with rewards normalized within each harness and one across harnesses—using identical replay data. Results show modest gains over the supervised fine-tuning baseline (+0.48 and +0.77 percentage points for within and cross normalization, respectively), but no consistent advantage of cross normalization on unseen harnesses. Performance differences across harnesses are much larger than the training gains, indicating that harness dependence remains a significant challenge.
Modern reinforcement learning (RL) post-training pipelines for large language models (LLMs) increasingly combine rollout workloads across multiple domains and feedback paradigms. Prefix-aware routing improves inference efficiency through cache reuse and load balancing, but it does not control how heterogeneous rollout sessions compete for KV-cache capacity.