Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Terra

OpenAI has released GPT‑6.1 Terra, a fast, efficient model that emphasizes detailed visual reasoning and precise computer use while offering clearer, more natural writing. It is positioned as a mid‑range option—cheaper than Sol but smarter than Luna—suitable for tasks like drafting proposals, interpreting technical drawings, filling out forms, and editing videos. The model is priced at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens, roughly half the cost of its predecessor GPT‑5.6 Terra.

Simon Willison
Sep 3

GPT‑6 Astra

GPT‑6 Astra is a new OpenAI model rolling out today to a limited set of organizations and soon to all ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise users, and via the OpenAI API and AWS. It is priced at $10/million input and $50/million output, matching Claude Fable 5/5.1, and outperforms Fable on most OpenAI self‑reported benchmarks, achieving 99.9% on the ARC‑AGI 3 benchmark with a custom Provider Adapter harness. Astra excels in security tasks—scoring 100% on ExploitBench, 42.4% on ExploitGym, and 99.2% on SRE‑Bench—and handles long context well, hitting 100% on OpenAI’s eight‑needle benchmark at 256K–512K tokens and 96.3% at 512K–1M tokens, though it remains behind Fable on the Intelligence Index and Meta’s Muse Spark 1.3.

arXiv AI
Jul 16

Inference Economics of Enterprise Coding Agents: A Case Study of Cloud vs. On-Premise LLMs

arXiv:2607. 13080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous coding agents force engineering organizations to choose between API-based frontier models -- strong reasoning at high token cost -- and on-premise quantized open-weights models, which promise low-marginal-cost scaling and data sovereignty at some loss of reasoning fidelity.

By Sheng-Wei Peng, Yi-Hsun Lin, Yi-Pei Lee
arXiv AI
Oct 21

EGI-BENCH: An Enterprise General Intelligence Benchmark Suite

EGI‑BENCH is a unified benchmark suite for evaluating large language model agents in enterprise settings, consolidating eight existing benchmarks (CRMARENA, HERB, PERSONABENCH, USERBENCH, MCP‑UNIVERSE, MCPEVAL, BENCHFORCE, LOCOBENCH) under a single command‑line interface with two runtime‑budgeted modes. It introduces the Enterprise General Intelligence (EGI) Score, a six‑dimensional framework (M1‑M6) that aggregates fine‑grained sub‑metrics from each benchmark rather than simple averages, providing a more nuanced view of model capabilities. The paper reports results for fourteen LLMs across GPT, Claude, and Gemini families, showing varied strengths across task outcome, planning, retrieval, tool actioning, safety, and engineering quality.

By Zhiwei Liu, Zhujun Lan, Jielin Qiu, Zixiang Chen, Liangwei Yang, Ming Zhu, Akshara Prabhakar, Wenting Zhao, John Emmons, Jason Wu, Shafiq Rayhan Joty, Junnan Li, Shelby Heinecke, Silvio Savarese, Huan Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 22

Now We Know? A Systematic Comparison of TerraMind and THOR

arXiv:2607. 18504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) increasingly rank models by aggregate score, but such rankings obscure why models differ: how much of the gap is architecture, how much is decoder capacity, and how much is a use-case-specific artefact?

By Frederick Schindlegger, Kenzo Bounegta, Eva Gmelich Meijling, Johannes Jakubik, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, Theodor Forgaard, Nicolas Longepe, Valerio Marsocci
arXiv AI
Oct 26

Benchmarks Are Surprisingly Compaction-Friendly

The paper investigates how context compaction—losing information to free up a language model’s context window—affects performance on long‑horizon agentic tasks. Using the OpenCode scaffold and five compaction strategies, the authors evaluate three frontier models on PaperBench, ProgramBench, and PostTrainBench, finding that compaction thresholds largely do not hurt performance for 1M‑context models, but can degrade GPT‑5.3‑Codex on certain benchmarks. The study also shows that compaction can silently drop critical task constraints, especially on ProgramBench and real user‑agent sessions from SWE‑chat, yet current benchmarks remain largely compaction‑friendly because objectives are fixed and progress is stored externally.

By Jeanne Salle, Hardik Bhatnagar, Matthias Bethge, Sahar Abdelnabi, Maksym Andriushchenko
arXiv AI
Oct 15

Google Earth AI Geospatial Reasoning Agent: Capabilities and a Systematic Evaluation

arXiv:2610.15750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Google Earth AI is a family of geospatial AI models, together with an agent that orchestrates them. We present this agent, Google Earth AI's Geospatial...

By Noam Slonim, Aviv Slobodkin, Gil Fidel, Gal Moshitch, Mimi Sun, Lily Mihalkova, Joydeep Paul, Per Bjornsson, Sydney Lin, Jamie McPike, Samapriya Roy, Utkarsh Patel, Gia Jung, Zachary Luna, Allison Berman, William Cai, Xiao Wu, Mohit Agarwal, Mandar Sharma, Aliza Hoffman, Mark Young, Rama Pasumarthi, Roy Lee, Ruth Alcantara, Luke Barrington, Aaron Bell, Reuven Sayag, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Tyler McHenry, Ronald Ho, Christopher Haire, Oliver Guinan, Niv Efron, Tim Thelin, Gautam Prasad, Shravya Shetty