arXiv AI October 21, 2026 By Zhiwei Liu, Zhujun Lan, Jielin Qiu, Zixiang Chen, Liangwei Yang, Ming Zhu, Akshara Prabhakar, Wenting Zhao, John Emmons, Jason Wu, Shafiq Rayhan Joty, Junnan Li, Shelby Heinecke, Silvio Savarese, Huan Wang

EGI-BENCH: An Enterprise General Intelligence Benchmark Suite

Read the original on arXiv AI →

EGI‑BENCH is a unified benchmark suite for evaluating large language model agents in enterprise settings, consolidating eight existing benchmarks (CRMARENA, HERB, PERSONABENCH, USERBENCH, MCP‑UNIVERSE, MCPEVAL, BENCHFORCE, LOCOBENCH) under a single command‑line interface with two runtime‑budgeted modes. It introduces the Enterprise General Intelligence (EGI) Score, a six‑dimensional framework (M1‑M6) that aggregates fine‑grained sub‑metrics from each benchmark rather than simple averages, providing a more nuanced view of model capabilities. The paper reports results for fourteen LLMs across GPT, Claude, and Gemini families, showing varied strengths across task outcome, planning, retrieval, tool actioning, safety, and engineering quality.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Sep 2

UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities

UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.

By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 24

InferenceBench: A Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Inference Optimization by AI Agents

arXiv:2607. 20468v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly used to automate research and development tasks, yet existing benchmarks typically evaluate them on prescribed workflows or narrow action spaces.

By Jehyeok Yeon, Ben Rank, Maksym Andriushchenko

llms agents efficiency benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Oct 7

Evaluating Inference Compute for Generative AI: A Framework for Enterprise Workloads

arXiv:2610.07094v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM deployment is shifting from single-turn completion to agentic trajectories in which a model plans, calls tools, reads results and reasons at test...

By Abbas Raza Ali, Muhammad Ajmal Siddiqui, Moona Zahid

llms agents efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 7

CodeGrep: An RL-Trained Retrieval Agent for LLM Coding Agents

arXiv:2608. 05886v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLM coding agents such as Claude Code and OpenHands share a common inefficiency: they spend much of their token budget finding the file to patch, rather than patching it.

By Wuya Chen, Yihao yang, Yang Cao, Yue Lin

llms agents reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jul 17

OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios

arXiv:2607. 14989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction.

By Chengyu Shen, Yujie Fu, Gangtao Xin, Yanheng Hou, Wenlong Fei, Guojie Zhu, Jiawei Li, Hongcheng Gao, Runming He, Zhen Hao Wong, Meiyi Qiang, Hao Liang, Zhao Cao, Hao Jiang, Chong Chen, Wentao Zhang

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 6

Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows

arXiv:2606. 05670v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Does adding more agents help an LLM workflow once compared systems share the same benchmark loader, tool access, answer contract, usage accounting, and trajectory logging?

By Yuhang Fu, Ruishan Fang, Jiaqi Shao, Huiyu Zheng, Zhengtao Zhu, Bing Luo, Tao Lin

llms agents benchmarks

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities

InferenceBench: A Benchmark for Open-Ended LLM Inference Optimization by AI Agents

Evaluating Inference Compute for Generative AI: A Framework for Enterprise Workloads

CodeGrep: An RL-Trained Retrieval Agent for LLM Coding Agents

OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios

Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows