The paper proposes 5W1H+Which, a semantic indexing framework that separates source‑grounded content extraction from progressive ontology binding. It organizes content into independently addressable units based on the 5W1H questions, while the "Which" component records links to versioned ontology elements, mapping relations, applicability scopes, and validation states. The design tracks business‑valid time, system knowledge time, and operational traces to enable revalidation and incremental maintenance, and illustrates its use with cloud migration and temporal policy examples.
arXiv:2507. 21438v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ontologies and knowledge graphs require continuous evolution to remain comprehensive and accurate, but manual curation is labor intensive.
The paper presents a knowledge layer that reorganizes enterprise Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for multi‑agent systems by placing an ontology at the artifact level rather than on extracted entities. Using a seven‑agent reverse‑engineering pipeline, the authors processed 241 repositories across 18 services to generate thousands of artifacts that capture scope, journeys, rules, and acceptance criteria, each tagged with provenance metadata. The resulting self‑describing catalog, sparse metadata registry, and navigation hypergraph enable queries to resolve to artifact identifiers, thereby structurally disambiguating near‑identical rules and improving retrieval accuracy. The system was built in under a week and helped root‑cause over 100 production defects and attribute 35 release regressions to specific rules and services.
arXiv:2608.22974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents rely heavily on knowledge encoded in model parameters or presented as unstructured context. In domain-specific tasks,...
EvoOntology introduces a self‑evolving ontology layer for data agents, encapsulating the ontology as an MCP server with schema, content, and tool layers. It enables agents to query and interact with the ontology at runtime, using a builder agent for autonomous construction and a self‑evolution loop that refines the ontology through attribution‑guided edits validated by backbone‑conditional evaluation. Experiments on three data‑agent benchmarks with four LLM backbones show that EvoOntology consistently outperforms strong baselines and existing semantic‑layer approaches, effectively bridging the agent‑data gap for heterogeneous data.
arXiv:2506. 01232v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deriving OWL ontologies from relational database schemas supports semantic interoperability and downstream tasks such as knowledge graph population, ontology-based data access, graph-based learning, and automated reasoning.
UniDataAgent (UniDataAgent) is an ontology‑grounded system designed to automate enterprise question‑to‑report tasks while preserving organization‑specific semantics. It separates semantic acquisition from online execution, with an Ontology Acquisition and Validation (OAV) stage that builds versioned ontologies from metadata, business knowledge, and expert input, and a Question‑to‑Report Execution (QRE) stage that retrieves semantic contracts, coordinates skills and data tools, validates results, and produces evidence‑linked reports. In a deployment across 27 enterprise tables and thousands of metric types, ontology construction took a few hours versus a week manually, and report generation took minutes versus several working days, achieving 95.0% strict accuracy on real business questions compared to 72.5% for document RAG.
arXiv:2608. 14228v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Life science knowledge graphs make large collections of structured data available through SPARQL, but each resource uses its own schema, identifiers, and links.
arXiv:2610.14428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflow automation typically requires retrieving a complete and accurate set of relevant information from large operational document corpor...
The paper introduces an explainable, header‑centric framework for semantic table interpretation and data quality assessment that operates solely on column headers. It maps headers to 39 interpretable types using curated lexical resources, applies validation rules to detect data quality issues, and aggregates these into a lightweight quality metric called HeadersIQ. The framework was evaluated on diverse benchmarks, demonstrating broad coverage of noisy real‑world metadata and providing a workflow for metadata‑driven semantic annotation, quality monitoring, and benchmark diagnosis.
arXiv:2605. 28787v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the era of autonomous agents, machine-actionable data is critical for data-driven workflows.
arXiv:2607. 18029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata.
arXiv:2607. 02116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous AI agents increasingly depend on external knowledge stores, yet most retrieval pipelines provide relevance without durable guarantees of provenance, version identity, integrity, traceability, or point-in-time reconstruction.