arXiv:2606. 11265v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are vulnerable to corpus poisoning attacks that manipulate downstream model outputs through malicious knowledge injection.
By Xi Nie, Hongwei Li, Shenghao Wu, Mingxuan Li, Jiachen Li, Wenbo Jiang
arXiv:2603. 22934v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves large language model applications by grounding generation in retrieved evidence, but also introduces corpus poisoning as a new attack surface.
By Xiangyu Yin, Yi Qi, Chih-Hong Cheng
arXiv:2610. 01871v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) has emerged as a reliable and cost-effective technique of grounding the generative capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) into relevant, up-to-date, external knowledge.
By Maria Carmen Jica, Ali Satvaty, Suzan Verberne, Fatih Turkmen
arXiv:2606. 02643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-enhanced LLM systems, while powerful, introduce substantial inference costs due to the inclusion of an extra multi-stage pipeline that dynamically retrieves and synthesizes information from external knowledge sources.
By Chengliang Liu, Liangbo Ning, Yujuan Ding, Wenqi Fan
arXiv:2608. 28389v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) augments LLMs with external documents, but public or user-editable sources expose RAG systems to data poisoning: attackers can inject malicious documents to steer outputs toward targeted answers.
By Jaewon Jung, Haizhong Zheng, Hongsun Jang, Jaeyong Song, Beidi Chen, Jinho Lee
arXiv:2601. 12359v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompt injection attacks have become an increasing vulnerability for LLM applications, where adversarial prompts exploit indirect input channels such as emails or user-generated content to circumvent alignment safeguards and induce harmful or unintended outputs.
By Anirudh Sekar, Mrinal Agarwal, Rachel Sharma, Akitsugu Tanaka, Jasmine Zhang, Arjun Damerla, Kevin Zhu
arXiv:2510. 00586v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing data poisoning attacks on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems scale poorly because they require costly optimization of poisoned documents for each target phrase.
By Yen-Shan Chen, Sian-Yao Huang, Cheng-Lin Yang, Yun-Nung Chen
arXiv:2608. 05430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The remarkable instruction-following ability of modern LLMs has enabled their practical use as the minds of agents that can autonomously complete increasingly complex tasks.
By Buzhao Liu, Xinhang Ma, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
VerTox is a framework that turns corpus poisoning of neural ranking models into a verifiable reward‑guided reinforcement learning problem. By fine‑tuning compact large language models with reward shaping that couples ranking distortion and factual corruption, VerTox generates fluent, low‑perplexity adversarial documents that frequently outrank target items across multiple ranking architectures, including a commercial embedding model. Experiments show near‑perfect attack success and significant degradation of downstream retrieval‑augmented generation performance.
By Zhiqi Huang, Vivek Datla, Zhichao Xu, Puxuan Yu, Vivek Srikumar, Alfy Samuel
arXiv:2609.35908v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Semantic caches reduce LLM serving costs by reusing previously generated answers for semantically similar queries. However, retrieval is based solely...
By Zihan Zhang, Shuangjie Yao, Zesen Liu, Zhixiang Zhang, Wai Ip Lai, Dung Hiu Hilton Yeung, Chun Kit Zhang, Fuchen Ma, Yuanyuan Yuan, Yu Jiang, Dongdong She
arXiv:2605. 31219v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While decision-based black-box adversarial attacks present a severe security threat, current methodologies suffer from fundamental limitations.
By Ei Hmue Khine, Yao Li, Jiebao Sun, Shengzhu Shi, Zhichang Guo, Boying Wu
RAGSentinel is a training‑free, label‑free defense designed for black‑box retrieval‑augmented generation systems. It employs a surrogate encoder to detect hidden‑state shifts caused by retrieved documents, removes shared topic directions, and filters poisoned documents as geometric outliers from a robust majority consensus. The method is proven to recover a poison‑free majority context under honest‑majority and representation‑separation assumptions, and experiments show it keeps attack success rates low while maintaining accuracy across multiple datasets, LLM families, and adaptive attacks.
By Yueyang Quan, Anjun Gao, Yufei Xia, Minghong Fang, Zhuqing Liu