arXiv Machine Learning

Does My Embedding Reflect That $A = B$? Evaluating Mathematical Equivalence in Embedding Models

arXiv:2606. 23959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Because mathematics is highly abstract, a single statement can take very different forms depending on what subfield it is framed in.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Learning to Discover Interesting Mathematics

The paper introduces a method for evaluating the intrinsic interestingness of mathematical theorems by comparing the length of their proofs to the length of their statements. It trains a 27B language model to predict proof difficulty, enabling the generation and selection of more interesting theorems while significantly reducing overlap with existing Mathlib. The approach allows iterative expansion of a self‑building, machine‑verified mathematical library guided by quantifiable metrics.

By Niket Patel, Ahmad Rammal, Amaury Hayat, Remi Munos, Julia Kempe
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

MathNet: a Global Multimodal Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning and Retrieval

arXiv:2604. 18584v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mathematical problem solving remains a challenging test of reasoning for large language and multimodal models, yet existing benchmarks are limited in size, language coverage, and task diversity.

By Shaden Alshammari, Kevin Wen, Abrar Zainal, Mark Hamilton, Navid Safaei, Sultan Albarakati, William T. Freeman, Antonio Torralba
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

Mapping Similarity Spaces across Embedding Models with Synthetic Query Probing

Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems rely on similarity scores to retrieve relevant content, yet scores are not directly comparable across embedding models due to differing geometric properties, complicating model migration and limiting threshold reuse. We study how similarity scores can be related by learning mappings between score distributions rather than embeddings.