The paper investigates how dense embedding models can be used for stance-aware argument retrieval, a task that requires both topic relevance and correct stance (support or attack) toward a claim. Experiments reveal that current models favor topical overlap and ignore stance, and that contrastive training to fix this bias leads to over-correction, where models focus too much on polarity keywords at the expense of topic relevance. To address this, the authors propose diagnostic word-ablation metrics and a data‑centric solution involving a balanced argument curriculum and LLM‑augmented stance‑inverted arguments, which helps powerful models learn deeper directional logic and improves stance‑aware retrieval performance.
By Angelo Sparacino, Francesca Toni, Adam Dejl
arXiv:2608.29529v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Semantic alignment between specialized normative texts is challenging when equivalent requirements use different terms, syntax, and levels of abstrac...
By William Schroeder
arXiv:2509. 15676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) to new and data-scarce tasks using only a few carefully selected task-specific examples presented in the prompt.
By Vaibhav Singh, Soumya Suvra Ghosal, Kapu Nirmal Joshua, Soumyabrata Pal, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
The paper introduces AVA, a framework that tests whether general NLP embeddings can differentiate logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs. AVA uses 171,007 contrastive triplets from 163 ontologies, each containing an ontology statement, a paraphrase, and a hard negative with contradictory meaning. Evaluation of over 25 embedding models shows significant limitations, with the best model achieving only 0.739 triplet accuracy and 0.135 for hard negatives; fine‑tuning helps but does not transfer well to downstream Semantic Web tasks.
By Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, S\"oren Auer
arXiv:2510. 09711v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC), offering strong reasoning and generalization capabilities beyond traditional embedding-based approaches.
By Wenbin Guo, Xin Wang, Jiaoyan Chen, Lingbing Guo, Zhao Li, Zirui Chen
arXiv:2609.24932v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenome...
By David Torres-Moreno, Jorge Hermosillo-Valadez, Asela Reig-Alamillo
The paper investigates whether reasoning always benefits universal multimodal embeddings (UMEs). By comparing the discriminative and reasoning-driven branches of UME-R1, the authors find that while reasoning improves positive similarity in 56.6% of cases, it also creates 15.7% false-helpful instances where hard negatives are drawn closer. Diagnostic analyses reveal that reasoning often de‑condenses retrieved neighborhoods and that chain‑of‑thought tokens encode evidence common to both positives and hard negatives. Based on these insights, the authors introduce SURE, a utility router that boosts UME-R1‑7B by 1.5 points and consistently improves other embedding models on MMEB‑V2 without retraining or extra VLM passes.
By Wenxiao Fan, Jingling Fu, Luohang Liu, Xinyuan Shan, Lichen Ma, Yu He, Junshi Huang, Yan Li, Kan Li
arXiv:2606. 23959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Because mathematics is highly abstract, a single statement can take very different forms depending on what subfield it is framed in.
By Jiaying Ye, Samarth Rao, Leo Carlin, Kedar Chintalapati, Saharsh Bhargava, Rachit Jaiswal, Michael Zhou, Jared Darlington, Jarod Alper, Vasily Ilin, Henry Kvinge
arXiv:2606.13061v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Reasoning-driven universal multimodal embedding has advanced rapidly by introducing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning into the embedding pipeline. D...
By Peixi Wu, Biao Yang, Feipeng Ma, Bosong Chai, Bo Lin, Wei Yuan, Fan Yang, Tingting Gao, Hebei Li, Xiaoyan Sun
Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenomena underlying their predictions. We present SLITE...
General-purpose NLP embedding models perform well on linguistic tasks, but their ability to capture symbolic ontological structure remains unclear. We introduce AVA, a systematic framework for evaluat...
arXiv:2607.00171v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Text embeddings are standard for semantic similarity tasks, yet their evaluation remains an open challenge. Current benchmarks are static, cover on...
By Andrianos Michail, Stylianos Psychias, Michelle Wastl, Simon Clematide, Rico Sennrich, Juri Opitz