arXiv Computation and Language

Collapse, Not Complexity: Failure-Conditioned Decomposition Repair for End-to-End Document Parsing

arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

What Breaks and What Comes Back: Capability Damage and Recovery in Depth-Pruned Small Language Models

Depth pruning removes entire Transformer blocks to shrink and speed up language models, but the resulting damage is uneven across capabilities. In a study of four 1.2–1.7 B instruction‑tuned models, function calling and mathematical reasoning collapsed in every case, while other skills varied in order of degradation. Fine‑tuning a short ‘healing’ run can restore some abilities, with the choice of which blocks to retrain and the allocation of a limited token budget influencing recovery outcomes.

By Piyush Dhoka, Vedant Pandhare, Varun Inamdar, Aadarsh Pathre, Pavitha Nooji
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

Fidelity Collapses with Table Size, Not Turn Count: Delivery Architecture in a Deployed Tool-Using Agent

The study compares two delivery architectures for a multi‑turn agent that uses a tool to retrieve structured records. In the SYNTHESIS architecture, all records are fed into the model’s context, leading to a dramatic drop in accuracy as the table grows beyond about 74 rows. The BYPASS architecture keeps records in session state and delivers them via a typed side channel, maintaining high accuracy (92.3%) regardless of table size across four large language models.

By Tung Thanh Hoang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

WeVisDoc: From Coverage to Capability for Robust End-to-End Document Parsing

WeVisDoc is a two‑stage data‑centric framework designed to improve end‑to‑end document parsing. Stage I expands coverage by adding heterogeneous data and applying structure‑preserving degradation synthesis, while Stage II evaluates residual errors with a held‑out probe and uses those diagnostics to target data construction and token budget reallocation. The resulting WeVisDoc‑4B model achieves an overall score of 95.38 on OmniDocBench v1.6 and outperforms competing parsers across all evaluated settings, with Stage II delivering notable gains on degraded tracks.

By Hao Yu, Kang Liu, Linnan Zhao, Jiabo Zhan, Chong Sun, Chen Li, Jing Lyu
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Completed Pairs Hide Capped Failures: A ReVerPi Case Study of Selective Context Projection

The study examines how context projection—replacing older tool observations with concise, addressable excerpts—affects performance in ReVerPi, a Pi extension that archives observations and matches full to projected continuations. Across 86 source‑reading runs and 641 model requests, 15 completed pairs achieved identical success rates (12/15 per arm), while 12 boundary runs halted when the first arm failed, revealing that projection can reduce logical tokens by 25% but increase median pair tokens by 29% and total suffix requests from 35 to 55. The analysis highlights the importance of retaining all intervention boundaries, executing both arms independently, and reporting completion, token usage, and interaction details to accurately assess stopping rules and resource aggregation.

By Guangzhe Zhang
arXiv AI
Jul 16

ShortOPD: Recovering Pruned LLMs with Short-to-Long On-Policy Distillation

arXiv:2607. 13124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured pruning is a hardware-friendly way to compress LLMs, but it is mostly validated on multiple-choice recognition tasks, while the same compressed checkpoints can collapse on the free-form generation that deployment actually requires.

By Qingyu Zhang, Qianhao Yuan, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Xiang Li, Ming Xu, Jiarui Li, Xiuyin Zhao
arXiv AI
Oct 28

Rare, Relevant, and Still Wrong: How Memory Fails LLM Group Decisions

The paper investigates how short memory representations of large‑language‑model (LLM) group discussions affect final decision quality. It introduces CrossProfile, a benchmark of 480 hidden‑profile tasks that separates supporting, decoy, and irrelevant facts while keeping their wording constant. Experiments with Qwen2.5‑7B, Llama‑3.1‑8B, and DeepSeek models show that heuristics based on rarity or relevance both fail in predictable ways, and that the decision model’s social‑proof bias further degrades accuracy. Removing attribution tags or randomizing them improves performance, yet natural transcripts still lose more evidence than no notes at all.

By Anouar Imel, Imad Charradi, Abderrahman Sghir, Khalil El Khammar