Hugging Face Trending Papers

When All Rollouts Fail: Policy-Compatible Joint Decoding for Hard-Problem Reasoning

The paper introduces Policy-Compatible Reinforcement Learning (PICO), a method that combines distribution-constrained joint decoding with on-policy rollouts to address the learning cliff in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). PICO guides token-level decoding using expert data while preserving the model’s relative token probabilities, and employs a dynamic top‑k mechanism to keep sampling within a finite divergence budget. This approach yields verified, policy‑compatible trajectories that are jointly optimized with on‑policy rollouts, leading to consistent performance gains over standard RLVR and prior off‑policy baselines across diverse reasoning datasets and agentic benchmarks.

arXiv AI
6d ago

When All Rollouts Fail: Policy-Compatible Joint Decoding for Hard-Problem Reasoning

The paper introduces Policy-Compatible Reinforcement Learning (PICO), a method that addresses the learning cliff in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) by performing distribution-constrained joint decoding. PICO guides token-level decoding with expert data while preserving the model’s token probabilities, and uses a dynamic top‑k mechanism to keep sampling within a finite divergence budget. The resulting trajectories are verified and policy‑compatible, and are jointly optimized with on‑policy rollouts using a mixed‑behavior objective that mitigates distribution mismatch via importance sampling, leading to consistent performance gains over standard RLVR and prior off‑policy baselines on diverse reasoning datasets and agentic benchmarks.

By Zehao Wang, Hanzhu Chen, Runquan Gui, Zhe Wang, Lin Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 15

DyJR: Preserving Diversity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay

arXiv:2603.16157v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances Large Language Model reasoning, on-policy algorithms like GRPO are sample-inefficient as they disc...

By Long Li, Zhijian Zhou, Tianyi Wang, Weidi Xu, Zuming Huang, Wei Chu, Zhe Wang, Shirui Pan, Chao Qu, Yuan Qi
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Your Language Model is Its Own Critic: Reinforcement Learning with Value Estimation from Actor's Internal States

The paper introduces POISE, a reinforcement learning algorithm that uses a model’s internal states as a value estimator to reduce variance in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). By employing a lightweight probe that reads internal signals during the forward pass, POISE predicts baselines online and uses a cross‑rollout construction to keep gradients unbiased. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B and OLMo3‑7B‑Instruct‑DPO across six domains show POISE outperforms existing RLVR baselines, offering more stable training and a value model that generalizes across tasks and scales with the policy.

By Yunho Choi, Jongwon Lim, Woojin Ahn, Minjae Oh, Jeonghoon Shim, Yohan Jo
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization: Learning to Reason with Adaptive Rationale Scaffolding

Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization (RGPO) is a reinforcement‑learning framework that adaptively uses ground‑truth rationale information to scaffold a language model’s reasoning process. Instead of treating reference solutions as fixed imitation targets, RGPO temporarily incorporates rationales to help the model generate better responses, then reverts to unguided learning with higher‑reward, model‑generated solutions. Experiments in both language‑only and vision‑language tasks show that RGPO consistently outperforms RLVR baselines, with ablation studies confirming that adaptive rationale guidance is a key factor in its success.

By Hoang Phan, Minh Pham, Chau Pham, Chinmay Hegde, Trung Le, Qi Lei
arXiv AI
Sep 30

SIPO: Unifying Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Self-Distillation

SIPO (Self‑Instructing Policy Optimization) unifies reinforcement learning with on‑policy self‑distillation by using a contrastive self‑teacher to generate token‑level credit signals. The method samples multiple rollouts per prompt, pairs each with a reference answer and its mistakes, and uses the difference in teacher log‑probabilities to provide dense feedback while still respecting the overall task reward. Experiments on reasoning and code‑generation benchmarks show that SIPO outperforms both RLVR and OPSD baselines without requiring an external teacher or extra generation steps.

By Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Yueqi Wang, Yaokun Liu, Fengran Mo, Jinghan Zhang, Mung Yao Jia, Gyuseok Lee, Yang Zhang, Na Wei, Dong Wang