arXiv:2606. 06046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate the approximation of solution operators for partial differential equations (PDEs) using sparse high-dimensional techniques.
By Sebastian Neumayer, Daniel Potts, Fabian Taubert
arXiv:2610.04624v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Recovering Partial Differential Equation (PDE) coefficient fields from extremely sparse observations is a severely ill-posed inverse problem for wh...
By Yida Pan, Muhammad H. Ashiq, Chanyong Jung, Yixuan Jia, Jonah M. Miller, Qing Qu, Ismail Alkhouri
arXiv:2602. 06842v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning-based hybrid iterative methods (DL-HIMs) integrate classical numerical solvers with neural operators, utilizing their complementary spectral biases to accelerate convergence.
By Yuhan Wu, Jan Willem van Beek, Victorita Dolean, Alexander Heinlein
arXiv:2606. 27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution.
By Haina Jiang, Liam Wang, Peng-Chen Chen, Min Seop Kwak, Seungryong Kim, Brian Bell, Jeong Joon Park
arXiv:2509. 08765v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data-driven acceleration of scientific computing workflows has been a high-profile aim of machine learning (ML) for science, with numerical simulation of transient partial differential equations (PDEs) being one of the main applications.
By Mikhail Khodak, Min Ki Jung, Brian Wynne, Edmond Chow, Egemen Kolemen
arXiv:2602. 09708v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose physics-informed spectral diffusion (PISD), a methodology that combines generative latent diffusion models with physics-informed machine learning to generate solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) conditioned on partial observations, which includes, in particular, forward and inverse PDE problems.
By Davide Gallon, Philippe von Wurstemberger, Patrick Cheridito, Arnulf Jentzen
arXiv:2507.07292v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We develop a new and general encode-approximate-reconstruct operator learning model that leverages learned neural representations of bases for inpu...
By Jacob Hauck, Yanzhi Zhang
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
The paper presents a theoretical framework for certifying the accuracy of physics‑informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve partial differential equations. It derives generalization bounds that link the residual loss minimized during training to the actual error in the solution space, showing that if the neural approximation stays within a compact subset, a vanishing residual guarantees convergence to the true solution. Deterministic and probabilistic convergence results are provided, offering explicit error guarantees based on residual, boundary, and initial condition errors.
By Amartya Mukherjee, Maxwell Fitzsimmons, David C. Del Rey Fern\'andez, Jun Liu
The paper explores neural network solvers for infinity and p‑Laplace problems, employing Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets). It addresses computational challenges for large p values (2 to 1000) across 2D and 3D domains, showing advantages over traditional mesh‑based solvers, especially in three dimensions. The authors provide conditional convergence results for PINNs, a universal approximation theorem for DeepONet on the parametric p‑Poisson problem, and validate their methods with numerical experiments comparing performance to conventional approaches.
By Tak Shing Au Yeung, Ka Chun Cheung, Hannah Potgieter, Steven J. Ruuth, Simon See
arXiv:2605. 04853v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose HIN-LRI, a hybrid framework that augments a classical numerical solver with a neural operator trained to correct the solver's structured truncation error.
By Zhangyong Liang, Huanhuan Gao
The article discusses how automatic differentiation (AD) enables neural networks to compute derivatives of governing equations to machine precision, forming the backbone of physics-informed machine learning. However, the author argues that numerical exactness does not guarantee physical fidelity, as AD lacks awareness of the physical structure a solution must satisfy. The paper highlights that many physical constraints—such as convection directionality, diffusion, dispersion, conservation, thermodynamic consistency, symmetry, symplectic structure, positivity, monotonicity, and boundedness—are overlooked by AD, suggesting a need to rethink how PDE-driven neural surrogates are built.
By Ameya D. Jagtap