Logos: An Agent Harness on a Cross-Process Bus
arXiv:2608.28553v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern agent systems assemble capabilities at runtime, and this dynamic composition has recently received a complete formal treat ment in the spati...
arXiv:2608.28553v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern agent systems assemble capabilities at runtime, and this dynamic composition has recently received a complete formal treat ment in the spati...
arXiv:2609. 00546v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent systems are commonly described by the model and harness that currently produce their behavior.
arXiv:2607. 05397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent systems increasingly execute rather than advise.
The paper reports a failure study of a production agentic software‑delivery platform, analyzing 147 incidents across 81 runs. It shows that the standard reliability primitives—retry, timeout, and error‑rate circuit breaking—fail in practice, leading to costly loops, false trips, and blocked work. The authors identify two cross‑cutting causes—identity adequacy and evidence adequacy—and propose seven new reliability primitives that enforce reliability at the delegation level.
FAOPs introduces a formal framework for AI agent workflows, called Functional Agent Operating Procedures, that applies database‑grade discipline to multi‑step agent skills. It normalizes workflows into four progressive normal forms—Decomposed, Typed, Factored, and Scoped—ensuring each atomic step is type‑checked, scoped, bounded, and auditable. The framework includes a provably sound algebra for refactoring and parallelization, extensions for verified termination, optimization, and cost bounds, and an architectural classifier to assess AI necessity, all implemented in the SkillBase system with a runtime executor.
arXiv:2608. 03836v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A framework that persists execution state so a run can be interrupted, survive a crash, and continue must decide what a resume means for effects that already fired.
arXiv:2606. 22504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents often receive broad tool access for an entire task, even when a resource is needed only for one subgoal.
arXiv:2608.24569v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents build on one another's work through summaries, plans, and other intermediate artifacts. These records let a downs...
The paper introduces a formal framework for agent harnesses that guarantees termination, prevents drift, and enforces spend limits through bounded loops, gates, and repair relations. It proves that these guarantees hold even with repair budgets and demonstrates the effectiveness of the system by identifying vacuous gates and achieving low false‑accept rates in a 69‑loop catalogue. The authors provide an instrumented implementation and a held‑out mutant corpus to validate gate correctness.
arXiv:2609.38266v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic large language models (LLMs) now move money through tools, yet the record of what they did is usually a trace their own process emits beside...
Agentic systems use large language models (LLMs) to carry out concrete tasks. Prior work often borrows abstractions such as scheduling, caching or isolation piecemeal from operating systems, so the me...
arXiv:2606. 17182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems share state through memory stores, vector indices, and tool registries.