Hugging Face Trending Papers

Support Operation Factorization: Compositional Readout of Frozen Vision Encoders under Controlled Interventions

Compositional analysis of frozen vision encoders should determine both what changed and where it changed. Standard factor probes score these axes separately, however, and can reward multiple operations that reuse the same predicted slot.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

SenseFuse: Label-Free Fusion of Image and Shape Encoders for Open-Vocabulary 3D Instance Segmentation

SenseFuse introduces a label‑free fusion approach that balances 2D image and 3D shape encoders for open‑vocabulary 3D instance segmentation. By selecting a scene‑level fusion weight through an adaptive, sensitivity‑based mechanism, it improves mask labeling accuracy across multiple datasets, recovering up to 93% of the potential gain from an oracle weight. The method demonstrates that image and shape encoders have complementary failure patterns, leading to higher instance AP in most evaluated settings.

By Euiseok Han, Tri Ton, Hwanhee Kim, Seungyeon Ryu, Chang D. Yoo
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Same Encoder, Different Winner: A Paired-View Framework for Cell Painting Encoder Evaluation

The paper introduces CP‑BG‑Bench, a paired‑view evaluation framework for Cell Painting vision encoders that fixes a central cell across four matched views (raw crop, segmented, and density‑augmented variants). Using this framework on three datasets and three encoders, the authors show that standard single‑metric rankings (e.g., replicate mAP) vary systematically across protocols, revealing disagreements along axes of cell versus background, morphology versus context, and within‑study versus across‑batch performance. The study demonstrates that segmented views can outperform crops in certain tasks and that background‑driven gains are largely determined by experimental design rather than encoder choice.

By Tim Treis, Nikita Moshkov, Johan Fredin Haslum, Shantanu Singh, Fabian J. Theis
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2

PredErase: Training-Free Object-and-Effect Removal with Predictive Latent Guidance

PredErase is a training‑free method that removes objects and their photometric effects by guiding a frozen Fill model with predictive latent cues. It expands the user‑provided mask to a contact‑band region, uses I‑JEPA to generate a context‑conditioned target for the hole, and aligns Fill’s completions with this target while keeping surrounding pixels fixed. On benchmarks such as RemovalBench, RORD‑Val, and DEFACTO‑Val, PredErase improves the native FLUX.2 backbone for instance‑only masks, though supervised removers still outperform it on full‑image metrics.

By Waikit Xiu, Qiang Lu, Junbiao Chen, Xiying Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13

P2Fusion: Prompt-based Progressive Infrared-Visible Image Fusion via Dual-Prior Distillation

Infrared-visible image fusion (IVIF) is pivotal for multimodal perception, yet reconciling the inherent information disparity between thermal and textural features remains a fundamental challenge. Existing prior-guided methods often rely on static constraints that induce optimization conflicts or utilize extrinsic semantic priors from large-scale foundation models (e.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

LoRSA: Toward Generalizable Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Biomedical Downstream Tasks

arXiv:2608. 07749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning enables the adaptation of vision foundation models to biomedical tasks under limited computational resources, but a single low-rank update can constrain all task-specific changes to one narrow parameter subspace.

By Saed Moradi, Benyamin Ghojogh, M. Hadi Sepanj, Yimin Yang, Ashirbani Saha
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Parameter-efficient Prompt Tuning of Vision Foundation Model With Adaptive Focal Loss for Interpretable MCI Screening

arXiv:2607. 15047v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mild Cognitive Impairment is a critical early stage of cognitive decline that frequently precedes Alzheimer's disease, yet its automated detection from neuropsychological drawing tests remains fundamentally constrained by data scarcity, class imbalance, and diagnostic ambiguity near clinical boundaries.

By Javad Khoramdel, Farhad Hoseyni, Amirhossein Nikoofard
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

VTOS: Learning to Orchestrate Vision Tools by Co-Searching Solutions and Observers

VTOS (Vision Tools Orchestration Search) is a framework that adaptively orchestrates vision foundation tools—such as open‑vocabulary detectors, segmentation models, and post‑processing operators—by jointly searching for executable solution programs and observer programs that diagnose failures and provide feedback. The observer programs feed observations into a shared VisionThoughts knowledge base, guiding subsequent searches. In two case studies—dense object counting on LVIS‑Count and zero‑shot plant‑disease segmentation on PlantSeg‑OOD—VTOS outperforms static tool pipelines and agentic visual‑programming baselines, especially in complex scenarios like dense, occluded scenes and out‑of‑distribution segmentation.

By Jinchao Ge, Lingqiao Liu, Shuwen Zhao, Lei Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 24

A Shared Encoder Is Not a Shared Task: Conditional Comparison for Deep Expert Pools

The paper demonstrates that sharing a deep encoder alone does not eliminate the confounding effects in task-comparison scores. By introducing a conditional two‑discriminator discrepancy within the embedding space, the authors achieve robust detection of task changes, maintaining stability under input rotations and accurately tracking label‑permutation drift. This approach, integrated into a mixture‑of‑heads framework, outperforms traditional novelty triggers and generalizes across multiple backbones and datasets, including ImageNet‑21k ViT‑B/16, DINOv2, and CIFAR‑100.

By Kentaro Oda
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

DARTS: Decoder-Aware Representation Tuning via Surgery for Model Merging

The paper introduces DARTS, a method for tuning decoder representations during model merging. It addresses representation bias in autoregressive decoders by using an entropy‑weighted L1 loss and a per‑position additive bias to correct errors that accumulate across token positions. Experiments on code generation, mathematical reasoning, and instruction following with Llama‑2‑7B show that DARTS improves performance over standard surgery while adding only 0.1% extra parameters.

By Aaryan Ajay Sharma, Sai Nishanth Padala, Seganrasan Subramanian