arXiv AI

Making Reasoning Visible: Configuration-Aware Diagnostic Modeling for Adaptive Scaffolding in Structured Reasoning Tasks

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 7

Agreement Is Not Validity: Cross-Model LLM Consensus in Diagnosing Student Failure Modes in K-12 Math Tutoring Dialogue

arXiv:2610.08703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In K-12 mathematics tutoring, student-tutor dialogue provides rich evidence of learners' problem-solving processes and sources of difficulty. Learning...

By Clayton Cohn, Joyce Fonteles, Kirk Vanacore, Gianni Mazza, Candida Crawford, Tom Hooper, Gautam Biswas, Rene Kizilcec
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Examining Variation in How Guided AI Tutors Resolve Student Impasses

The study analyzes 20,462 student turns from 1,260 sessions with a guided LLM chemistry tutor, identifying 6,630 impasse turns categorized as conceptual errors, expressed uncertainty, or help‑seeking. Three tutoring conditions—baseline, no‑direct‑answer, and guided—were simulated, revealing that the baseline tutor often gave direct answers, the no‑direct‑answer tutor always asked follow‑up questions, and the guided tutor varied its responses based on context. Impasse trajectories showed that each additional impasse turn reduced the likelihood of recovery, while addressing errors became increasingly beneficial compared to repeated scripted questioning.

By Bakhtawar Ahtisham, Kirk Vanacore, Alessandra Napoli, Josh Arens, Ksenia Ionova, Clayton Cohn, Shima Salehi, Rene Kizilcec
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Evaluating Inquiry Learning in LLM-Based Agents: Hypothesizing, Reasoning, and Exploration

The paper introduces a framework to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on their ability to conduct full scientific inquiry cycles, combining hypothesis generation, reasoning, and exploration. By extending the Countdown task into a mathematical environment, the authors assess how LLMs probe systems, collect observations, and infer relationships, examining exploration strategies and causal discovery. Experiments across seven LLMs and various prompting methods show limited inherent inquiry skills, but structured guidance inspired by educational scaffolding markedly improves performance.

By Marta Kne\v{z}evi\'c, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Jibril Frej, Vinitra Swamy, Tanja K\"aser
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces

Ladders-of-Thought (LoT) is a framework that enhances reasoning in small- to mid-scale large language models by automatically generating easier variants of reasoning problems and organizing them into difficulty buckets. It uses a self‑evolving bandit scheduler to adaptively allocate training, improving performance across math and multi‑hop reasoning tasks on 1–8 B models. LoT achieves significant gains (e.g., +32 pp on AddSub, +16 pp on QASC) and converges faster than staged curricula.

By Minghui Liu, Thomas Magelinski, Dehao Yuan, Qi Yu, Furong Huang
arXiv AI
Aug 17

The Metacognitive Bottleneck: Japanese Riddles Reveal Fundamental Limits of Machine Insight and Self-Evaluation in Reasoning AI

arXiv:2509. 14704v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Benchmark saturation and training-data contamination increasingly obscure whether reported gains in large language models (LLMs) reflect genuine advances in reasoning or familiarity with recurring patterns in benchmark problems.

By Masaharu Mizumoto, Dat Nguyen, Zhiheng Han, Xingfu Li, Yo Nakawake, Le Minh Nguyen
arXiv AI
Jul 24

AI Assistants Overassist

arXiv:2607. 21306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as tutors and thought partners, helping users reason through problems.

By Verona Teo, Raghav Jain, Tobias Gerstenberg, Max Kleiman-Weiner
arXiv AI
1d ago

How Humans Learn Unfamiliar Worlds: A Think-Aloud Dataset on ARC-AGI-3

The paper presents the first dataset that captures how humans learn and use mechanisms in unfamiliar environments, using ARC‑AGI‑3 as a testbed. It includes 144 trajectories from 64 participants across 25 public games, each paired with time‑synchronized actions and think‑aloud audio, and 250 trajectories from large language model agents with and without harnesses. The dataset is annotated for mechanism triggers, action purposes, errors, and recovery, enabling a comparison of human and LLM cognition, highlighting differences in hypothesis testing, exploration, and use of qualitative representations.

By Shuzhi Liu, Archana Warrier, Dat Nguyen, Chengqi Zheng, Kevin Ellis, Yewen Pu