arXiv:2607. 10795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In open-domain multi-hop question answering (QA), LLM-based search agents offer a promising approach to knowledge-intensive QA by combining retrieval with reasoning.
By Xinkang Li, Rong Jiang, Xin Song, Ye Wang, Yue Han, Changjian Li
arXiv:2410.17021v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models with chain-of-thought prompting, such as OpenAI-o1, have shown impressive capabilities in natural language inference tasks. H...
By Xiaochen Wang, Liang Chen, Reza Haf Zhe Yang, Yiru Wang, Xiangdi Meng, Kunhao Pan, Zhifang Sui, Junqing He
arXiv:2609.07050v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) critically depends on retrieving the evidence necessary for effective reasoning. However, this remains particularl...
By JungMin Yun, YoungBin Kim
PRISM is an agentic retrieval framework that uses large language models in a structured loop to improve evidence gathering for multi‑hop question answering. It splits retrieval into three specialized agents—a Question Analyzer, a Selector focused on precision, and an Adder focused on recall—whose iterative interaction yields a compact yet comprehensive evidence set. Experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue, and MultiHopRAG show that PRISM consistently outperforms strong baselines by achieving higher retrieval accuracy and filtering out distracting content.
By Md Mahadi Hasan Nahid, Davood Rafiei
arXiv:2607. 22597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-hop question answering requires systems to retrieve evidence from multiple documents and connect scattered facts into a coherent reasoning process.
By Hong-Yu An, Yun-Jian Zhang, Chen-Wei Liang, Tian-Yi Zhang, Jian Ding, Yi-Lun Wu, Ao-Bo Li, Wei-Cong Su, Saifullah, Mujiangshan Wang
SCOPE is a training‑free generative prompt‑compression framework that reduces LLM input length by chunking a prompt into semantically coherent segments, rewriting each chunk to be more concise, and then reconstructing a coherent prompt. Unlike token‑removal methods, SCOPE’s chunk‑level rewriting preserves critical information and text coherence, and includes optimization techniques for finer‑grained control of compression ratios. Extensive evaluations on question‑answering and summarization tasks show that SCOPE consistently outperforms selective compression baselines, especially at high compression ratios.
By Tinghui Zhang, Yifan Wang, Daisy Zhe Wang
arXiv:2608.21265v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models often rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to solve complex tasks, but verbose reasoning traces introduce substantial inferen...
By Simeng Zhang, Yilong Chen, Wenyuan Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, Yao Chen, Junyuan Shang, Tingwen Liu
Spoken language models (SLMs) enable natural human-computer interaction, but their reasoning ability still lags behind that of text-based large language models, especially on spoken mathematical question answering tasks. One important reason is that SLMs reason over purely verbalized mathematical expressions, which are harder to interpret than symbolic text.
arXiv:2606. 28361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-step retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been widely deployed as LLM-powered web services for complex question answering, where iterative retrieval-reasoning rounds deliver strong multi-hop accuracy.
By Kuan Yan, Zhiqing Tang, Tian Wang, Weijia Jia
arXiv:2606. 05749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Iterative retrieval-reasoning agents have recently shown promise for multimodal long-document question answering.
By Kaifeng Chen, Hongtao Liu, Qiyao Peng, Jian Yang, Yongqiang Liu, Xiaochen Zhang, Qing Yang
arXiv:2606. 12767v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating procedural reasoning in AI-supported learning systems requires question-answer datasets that are both learner-like and grounded in the instructional knowledge the system is expected to use.
By Sarah Elshabrawy, Rahul K. Dass, Ashok K. Goel
arXiv:2608. 04444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate answers due to their reliance on static internal knowledge.
By Jiaoyang Li, Junhao Ruan, Shengwei Tang, Kaiyan Chang, Zhengtao Yu, Tong Xiao, Jingbo Zhu