ConRAG: Consensus-Driven Evidence Flow for Multi-Hop Question Answering
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 10562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the multi-hop reasoning capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge.
arXiv:2607. 10795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In open-domain multi-hop question answering (QA), LLM-based search agents offer a promising approach to knowledge-intensive QA by combining retrieval with reasoning.
arXiv:2610.08388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in question answering, yet they still frequently suffer from hallucinations on kno...
arXiv:2609.07050v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) critically depends on retrieving the evidence necessary for effective reasoning. However, this remains particularl...
DeepWeaver is a framework designed to improve open‑ended question answering by weaving noisy retrieved evidence into comprehensive, well‑cited answers. It introduces Thought Block Chains (TBCs) that organize claims, key information, and supporting evidence, and uses subordinate TBCs to refine and expand the evidence before final generation. Evaluations on LoQA and DeepResearch Bench show that DeepWeaver enhances content sufficiency, citation grounding, and detail preservation across multiple LLMs.
A new framework called APT‑RAG is introduced for evidence‑intensive question answering. It uses adaptive planning to expand a tree‑based reasoning structure according to question dependencies and evidence needs, and employs topology‑aware evidence gathering that reuses sibling evidence, retrieves directly, and aggregates evidence from child nodes. The approach also includes evidence‑guided batched answer generation to reduce generation overhead, and experimental results show it outperforms existing structured RAG methods on evidence‑intensive QA benchmarks.