The paper examines how fine‑tuned Transformer detectors (DistilBERT, RoBERTa) perform on an out‑of‑distribution dataset of hyper‑local news generated by LLMs. Using SHAP‑based explainable AI, it identifies three phenomena: a reliance on a “Call‑to‑Action” syndrome, a “Specificity Bias” where hallucinated named entities evade detection, and a “Wikipedia Paradox” where formal human text is misclassified as AI. These results highlight systematic shortcomings of purely statistical detection methods in structured human domains.
arXiv:2606. 04177v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interpretable linguistic features offer a promising approach for explaining why a given text appears machine-generated, particularly for non-expert users.
By Yassir El Attar, Esra D\"onmez, Maximilian Maurer, Agnieszka Falenska
The paper presents a large‑scale empirical study of 284 interpretable linguistic features to detect AI‑generated English text across 30 language models and 10 text domains. It finds that classifiers using only linguistic features can reliably distinguish machine‑from human‑written text, but most indicators are highly context‑dependent. Only lexical richness measures consistently generalize across model families and domains, offering robust signals for detection.
By Yassir El Attar, Esra D\"onmez, Maximilian Maurer, Agnieszka Falenska
arXiv:2609.15369v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Word-level detectors identify unedited AI-generated text almost perfectly, but the literature documents their brittleness under rewording, and a word-l...
By Jochen Madler (Sitefire)
arXiv:2603. 18482v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Standard decoding strategies for text generation, including top-$k$, nucleus sampling, and contrastive search, select tokens based on likelihood, restricting outputs to high-probability regions.
By Esteban Garces Arias, Nurzhan Sapargali, Christian Heumann, Matthias A{\ss}enmacher
NOTAI.AI is an explainable AI-generated text detection system that goes beyond a simple binary label by showing which signals influenced its prediction. It combines sentence-level conditional probability curvature, a neural detector score, and interpretable stylometric and readability features in an XGBoost meta-classifier, and explains predictions using TreeSHAP feature contributions that can be turned into concise natural-language explanations. Evaluated on a balanced subset of RAID, the full model achieves 0.9685 F1 and receives 94.5–98.6% approval from model judges for the faithfulness of its explanations.
By Oleksandr Marchenko Breneur, Adelaide Danilov, Aria Nourbakhsh, Salima Lamsiyah
The paper introduces SHAKTI, a large-scale Hindi benchmark for detecting AI-generated text, covering multiple genres, LLM families, prompting strategies, and adversarial transformations. It evaluates the benchmark with human annotation and examines linguistic, grammatical, and sentiment differences between human and AI texts. Building on these insights, the authors propose TRIDENT, a round‑trip translation‑based detection framework with three variants that outperforms existing baselines and demonstrates robustness across seven languages and adversarial settings.
By Shifali Agrahari, Sujit Kumar, Sanasam Ranbir Singh
Bias in natural language remains a persistent challenge in both human-written and AI-generated content, affecting domains such as journalism, education, and AI research. Most existing detection methods identify only the presence of bias, with limited support for granular detection, interpretable explanations, neutral rewriting, and openly available trained models.
Distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written text (HWT) becomes increasingly important due to potential misuse. However, most supervised detectors often degrade out-of-domain (OOD) a...
The paper introduces GPTBIAS, a framework that uses powerful large language models like GPT‑4 to evaluate bias in other LLMs. It employs specially crafted prompts called Bias Attack Instructions to probe for bias and outputs a bias score along with detailed information such as bias types, affected demographics, keywords, reasons, and improvement suggestions. Extensive experiments demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness and usability.
By Jiaxu Zhao, Meng Fang, Shirui Pan, Wenpeng Yin, Mykola Pechenizkiy
arXiv:2410. 12341v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As AI-generated content increasingly populates the web, generative AI models are at growing risk of being trained on their own outputs, a process known as AI autophagy.
By Daniele Gambetta, Gizem Gezici, Fosca Giannotti, Dino Pedreschi, Alistair Knott, Luca Pappalardo
arXiv:2607. 01208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models deployed in high-stakes roles can potentially favor certain entities, brands, or viewpoints, steering user decisions at scale.
By Shayan Talaei, Abhinav Chinta, Devvrit Khatri, Amin Karbasi, Azalia Mirhoseini, Amin Saberi