arXiv Computation and Language By Shifali Agrahari, Sujit Kumar, Sanasam Ranbir Singh

TRIDENT and SHAKTI: A Framework and Benchmark for Hindi AI-Text Detection

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces SHAKTI, a large-scale Hindi benchmark for detecting AI-generated text, covering multiple genres, LLM families, prompting strategies, and adversarial transformations. It evaluates the benchmark with human annotation and examines linguistic, grammatical, and sentiment differences between human and AI texts. Building on these insights, the authors propose TRIDENT, a round‑trip translation‑based detection framework with three variants that outperforms existing baselines and demonstrates robustness across seven languages and adversarial settings.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 1

IndicDetect: Evaluating Cross-Lingual LLM-Generated Text Detection for Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil

IndicDetect is a benchmark for evaluating AI‑generated text detection in Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil. It pairs curated human‑written texts with LLM‑generated counterparts across multiple domains and generators, testing detectors under domain shift, generator shift, and adversarial perturbation. The study shows that supervised neural detectors fail to generalize to unseen generators and attacks, with Hindi experiencing the greatest degradation, indicating that robustness—not peak accuracy—is the main weakness in Indic language detectors.

By Bhaskar Ganesh Devalla, Junchao Wu, Nilesh Dokuparthi, Greeshma Yaluru, Tatiana Muniz Rodriguez, Lidia S. Chao, Derek F. Wong
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

LLMTrace: A Corpus for Classification and Fine-Grained Localization of AI-Written Text

LLMTrace is a new large‑scale bilingual (English and Russian) corpus designed to improve AI‑written text detection. It contains character‑level annotations that enable precise localization of AI‑generated segments, supporting both full‑text binary classification and interval detection tasks. The dataset is built from a diverse set of modern proprietary and open‑source LLMs to address gaps in existing resources, such as outdated models, limited language coverage, and lack of mixed human‑AI authorship data.

By Irina Tolstykh, Aleksandra Tsybina, Sergey Yakubson, Maksim Kuprashevich
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Robust and Fine-Grained Detection of AI Generated Texts

arXiv:2504.11952v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: An ideal detection system for machine generated content is supposed to work well on any generator as many more advanced LLMs come into existe...

By Ram Mohan Rao Kadiyala, Siddartha Pullakhandam, Kanwal Mehreen, Drishti Sharma, Siddhant Gupta, Jebish Purbey, Ashay Srivastava, Subhasya TippaReddy, Arvind Reddy Bobbili, Suraj Telugara Chandrashekhar, Ankan Ghosh, Modabbir Adeeb, Srinadh Vura, Suman Debnath, Hamza Farooq
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

Beyond Surface Cues: Robust LLM-Generated Korean Text Detection

The paper introduces “KoLing”, a bias‑controlled adversarial benchmark of 50.9k Korean instances designed to suppress superficial cues while preserving semantic content, and evaluates both LLM‑generated and LLM‑modified text detection. It also proposes “KoLingProbe”, an interpretable detector grounded in theoretical linguistics that models Korean‑specific properties across multiple linguistic levels. Experiments demonstrate that KoLingProbe outperforms strong baselines on all detection tasks and remains robust to adversarial attacks, with analyses showing that integrating complementary linguistic features across multiple levels improves both performance and interpretability.

By SungHo Kim, SangKeun Lee
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Evaluating Large Language Models on Urdu Idioms

The paper introduces a new benchmark for Urdu‑to‑English idiomatic translation, featuring 4,000 manually verified sentence pairs in both native Perso‑Arabic script and Romanized Urdu. It evaluates multiple tasks—translation, paraphrasing, idiom span detection, and back‑translation—using various prompting strategies, and finds that state‑of‑the‑art large language models outperform traditional neural machine translation systems, especially in preserving figurative meaning. The study also highlights challenges posed by the lack of standardized orthography in Romanized Urdu, which affects consistency and idiom span detection.

By Muhammad Farmal Khan, Mousumi Akter