Hugging Face Trending Papers

Sparse Evidence Can Suffice: Agentic Evidence Seeking for Multimodal Video Misinformation Detection

Multimodal video misinformation detection is commonly formulated as a holistic video-understanding task, where the entire video and its associated content are processed and judged in a single pass. However, real-world misinformation often exhibits a sparse and compositional evidence structure: a reliable decision may depend on only a few coupled clues, while most video content contributes limited additional information.

arXiv AI
Jul 21

Sparse Evidence Can Suffice: Agentic Evidence Seeking for Multimodal Video Misinformation Detection

arXiv:2607. 18080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal video misinformation detection is commonly formulated as a holistic video-understanding task, where the entire video and its associated content are processed and judged in a single pass.

By Haochen Zhao, Yongxiu Xu, Xinkui Lin, Dong Xie, Jiarui Lu, Yuqi Qian, Yubin Wang, Hongbo Xu, Gaopeng Gou
arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago

PARSEE-VAD: Efficient Training-Free Online Video Anomaly Detection via Proposition-Aware Reasoning and Streaming Evidence Escalation

PARSEE-VAD is a training‑free online video anomaly detection framework that separates semantic evidence acquisition from score‑state evolution. It uses Proposition‑Aware Reasoning to extract structured propositional evidence from the current causal window and selectively activates more specific queries, while Streaming Evidence Escalation maps this evidence into a compact score‑domain event state and propagates only the bounded state to maintain temporal continuity. Experiments on four benchmarks show strong performance with reduced specialist computation and sparse score‑state propagation, supporting a current‑first principle for streaming multimodal inference.

By Ji Wang, Shuangqing Zhang, Guo-Sen Xie, Fang Zhao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

Beyond Frame Selection: Rethinking Long-Video Understanding with MLLMs

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong progress in video understanding, yet it remains challenging because the token limitation makes MLLMs difficult to capture temporally sparse evidence. Existing methods typically rely on uniform sampling, or frame selection, but these strategies usually optimize either broad temporal coverage or local relevance, making it difficult to preserve both global storyline context and fine-grained evidence.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 21

Video Evidence to Reasoning Efficient Video Understanding via Explicit Evidence Grounding

arXiv:2601. 07761v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) face a fundamental dilemma in video reasoning: they are caught between the prohibitive computational costs of verbose reasoning and the hallucination risks of efficient, ungrounded approaches.

By Yanxiang Huang, Guohua Gao, Zhaoyang Wei
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Finding the Right Evidence: Factor-Guided Coarse-to-Fine Reasoning for Long Videos

The paper introduces PACE, a factor-guided, progressive framework for acquiring evidence in long-video question answering. PACE first indexes clip-level descriptions using question-derived factors, then refines evidence retrieval with contrastive cues derived from candidate answers. On the MMR‑V dataset, PACE achieves 42.6% accuracy and recovers 66.9% of annotated cues, outperforming direct inference and prior agentic baselines, and shows consistent improvements across several long-video benchmarks.

By Baixuan Xu, Yinyui Xu, Tianshi Zheng, Zhaowei Wang, Weiqi Wang, Haochen Shi, Jiayu Liu, Qing Zong, Xiyu Ren, Xinyu Geng, Zhitao He, Yangqiu Song
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Moment-Video: Diagnosing Temporal Fidelity of Video MLLMs on Momentary Visual Events

arXiv:2606. 02522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made rapid progress on general and long-form video understanding, yet their ability to preserve brief answer-critical visual evidence remains underexplored.

By Xiaolin Liu, Yilun Zhu, Xiangyu Zhao, Xuehui Wang, Yan Li, Xin Li, Haoyu Cao, Xing Sun, Shaofeng Zhang, Xu Yang, Zhihang Zhong, Xue Yang