The paper proposes three information‑theoretic criteria for selecting the most relevant basis functions in sparse Gaussian process regression, tailored to different levels of prior knowledge. Experiments on six UCI regression datasets and three basis families (HSGP, VFF, VISH) show that the no‑data criterion is a robust default, often outperforming simple truncation, while the data‑aware criteria yield significant improvements for HSGP. The study demonstrates that careful basis‑function selection can lead to better performance without increasing computational cost.
arXiv:2606. 27298v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of learning a high-dimensional Gaussian truncated to an unknown halfspace.
The paper presents an exact, efficient solution for the Linear Model of Co‑regionalization (LMC) multitask Gaussian Process by decoupling latent processes under a mild noise‑model assumption. It introduces a full parametrization of the resulting projected LMC, enabling linear‑time optimization and simplifying tasks such as training updates and leave‑one‑out cross‑validation. Experiments on synthetic and real data demonstrate that projected LMC is competitive with state‑of‑the‑art multitask GP models while offering greater interpretability and computational ease.
arXiv:2608. 11917v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-output Gaussian process regression scales cubically in the number of observations times outputs, and dense kernel-matrix methods need bespoke handling whenever different outputs are observed at different inputs.
arXiv:2606. 02909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gradient observations can substantially improve Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, particularly in high-dimensional settings where function evaluations are expensive.
arXiv:2606. 01427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved substantial success in generalizing across tasks without problemspecific training or fine-tuning.
arXiv:2512. 06143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite a large corpus of recent work on scaling up Gaussian processes, a stubborn trade-off between computational speed, prediction and uncertainty quantification accuracy, and customizability persists.
arXiv:2606. 19369v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Estimation-of-distribution algorithms (EDAs) are a powerful class of evolutionary methods for black-box optimization, especially when little is known about the structure of the objective.
arXiv:2608.20998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reservoir computing (RC) couples a fixed recurrent dynamical system with a trained lightweight readout, but this efficiency is partly lost during hyper...
arXiv:2609.26843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Residual-based adaptive GMsFEM for high-contrast elliptic problems repeatedly evaluates local weighted $H^{-1}$ indicators on every coarse neighborho...
The paper introduces Backward Kernel Herding, an algorithm that iteratively removes data points to create representative subsets for kernel learning, achieving performance comparable to state‑of‑the‑art methods while speeding up subsampling when the reduced size is less than half the original dataset. It also proposes Flexible Kernel Thinning, an extension that allows construction of subsets of any size, not just successive halvings, and demonstrates that this method often yields the best predictive performance. Experiments on Gaussian Processes and Kernel Support Vector Machines show that Backward Kernel Herding excels in training‑time efficiency, while Flexible Kernel Thinning offers superior predictive accuracy and competitive memory usage, emphasizing the need to choose a reduction strategy based on the desired trade‑off between performance, cost, and memory.
arXiv:2608. 08826v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive procedures must work without nuisance information an oracle may use, such as a gradient scale or smoothness index, and robust procedures may have to answer queries whose coordinate and inspection time are chosen only after the data are seen.
The paper introduces HACK GPs, a method that treats kernel selection for Gaussian Processes as an online learning problem with expert advice. Each candidate kernel is viewed as a GP expert, and a distribution over these experts is updated online using AdaHedge based on a loss that reflects both function fit and task alignment. Two variants—Mixture of Gaussians and categorical sampling—are presented, with theoretical guarantees that the weight concentrates on the best kernel under a loss‑gap condition, and empirical results show robust performance across Bayesian optimization, level set estimation, and Bayesian active learning compared to standard kernels and simple ensembles.