arXiv Machine Learning

Intrinsic Robot Rewarding: Reusing VLA Representations for Autonomous Evaluation and Policy Improvement

Intrinsic Robot Rewarding (IRR) leverages existing vision‑language‑action (VLA) systems to evaluate a robot’s own outcomes and provide feedback for policy improvement. By using successful demonstration endpoints as task‑specific references and the policy’s frozen visual encoder as the feature space, IRR adds a reference bank and scoring operation to the current pipeline without requiring a separate evaluator or additional perception backbone. The approach aims to reduce integration effort, reward computation cost, and human outcome scoring while enabling learning from the data already available in industrial robot systems.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 7

Generalizable Dense Reward for Long-Horizon Robotic Tasks

arXiv:2604.00055v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing robotic foundation policies are trained primarily via large-scale imitation learning. While such models demonstrate strong capabilit...

By Silong Yong, Stephen Sheng, Carl Qi, Xiaojie Wang, Evan Sheehan, Anurag Shivaprasad, Yaqi Xie, Katia Sycara, Yesh Dattatreya
arXiv AI
Jul 24

TOPReward: Token Probabilities as Hidden Zero-Shot Rewards for Robotics

arXiv:2602. 19313v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: General-purpose robot learning requires dense, instruction-conditioned feedback that can distinguish meaningful task progress from stalled, failed, or partially completed behavior.

By Shirui Chen, Cole Harrison, Ying-Chun Lee, Angela Jin Yang, Zhongzheng Ren, Lillian J. Ratliff, Jiafei Duan, Dieter Fox, Ranjay Krishna
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

RDA: Reward Design Agent for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2606. 01672v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning has enabled the acquisition of impressive robotic skills, but typically requires hand-crafted reward functions that are slow to design and difficult to align with human intentions.

By Hojoon Lee, Ajay Subramanian, Ben Abbatematteo, Vijay Veerabadran, Pedro Matias, Karl Ridgeway, Nitin Kamra
arXiv AI
Oct 15

EmbodiedSkills: World Action Model-augmented Cascaded Skills for Vision-Language-Action Agent

EmbodiedSkills is a skill-based agent framework that enhances frozen vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies with world action models for consequence‑aware action selection. It defines reusable skills for observation, context encoding, candidate generation, consequence prediction, outcome evaluation, candidate comparison, and action execution, organized into five stages that support both continuous action chunks and pick‑and‑place primitives. The framework improves success rates on MetaWorld MT50, CLIPort, and CALVIN benchmarks by incorporating outcome predictions and lightweight comparators while keeping the core policy and observation encoders frozen.

By Wei Wang, Wenqiao Zhang, Yutong Lin, Yuqian Yuan, Tianwei Lin, Jinhao Mao, Zhenxuan Fan, Mingjian Gao, Yang Dai, Wentong Li, Zheqi Lv, Zheng Dong, Yingjie Niu, Jiaqi Zhu, Jun Xiao, Chao Li, Yueting Zhuang
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

D&A: Decoupling Description and Assessment Enables VLMs as Zero-Shot Robotic Reward Models

The paper introduces D&A (Describe & Assess), a prompt-based method that separates progress estimation into a textual description of scene dynamics and a subsequent assessment using explicit rubrics. By requiring Vision‑Language Models to generate an explicit definition of absolute success before scoring, D&A anchors evaluations to an external criterion, reducing confirmation bias and providing fine‑grained, partial progress metrics. Empirical results show that D&A matches or surpasses post‑trained reward models across tasks, embodiments, and benchmarks, and its reward estimates support efficient downstream reinforcement learning.

By Marius Memmel, Shawn Yin, Urvi Rutia, Angad Wadhwa, Eldon Li, Gavin Angeloff, Ankit Goyal, Jesse Zhang, Dieter Fox, Fabio Ramos, Anqi Li, Abhishek Gupta
arXiv AI
Jun 2

From Demonstrations to Rewards: Test-Time Prompt Optimization for VLM Reward Models

arXiv:2606. 00083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning relies on accurate reward functions, which are often hand-crafted or even unavailable in real-world applications, such as robotics.

By Christian Gumbsch, Leonardo Barcellona, Lennard Sch\"unemann, Platon Karageorgis, Andrii Zadaianchuk, Zehao Wang, Sergey Zakharov, Fabien Despinoy, Rahaf Aljundi, Efstratios Gavves
arXiv AI
Oct 12

JoyInside-VLM-Agent: Product-Conditioned Multimodal Policy Learning for Embodied Agents

JoyInside‑VLM‑Agent is a ReAct‑style multimodal agent that learns product‑conditioned policies for embodied robots and smart hardware. It uses a closed‑loop sandbox to generate interaction trajectories, supervised fine‑tuning, multi‑teacher on‑policy distillation, and reinforcement learning with DPER to align token‑level evidence and rewards. The agent achieves a BFCL v4 overall score of 77.44, surpassing baselines on JoyInside‑Devices and JoyInside‑Robotics, and demonstrates visually grounded search, replanning, and failure reporting in two real‑world quadruped case studies.

By Gangyi Li, LuYao Wang, Jingfu Sun, Jingyi Yuan, Hang Liu, Hao Zong, Yujia Hu, Tingting Gao, Jianyong Wang, Xu Yang
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Stage-Transition Dense Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2606. 31377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning for long-horizon robotic manipulation is often limited by sparse and delayed rewards, while manually designing dense shaping signals is costly and brittle to changes in environments and object configurations.

By Yang Yang, Bingjie Chen, Zihan Wang, Yizhe Li, Guoping Pan, Yi Cheng, Houde Liu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
6d ago

D&A: Decoupling Description and Assessment Enables VLMs as Zero-Shot Robotic Reward Models

The paper introduces D&A (Describe & Assess), a prompt‑based method that separates vision‑language model progress estimation into a textual description of scene dynamics and a rubric‑based assessment. By requiring the model to explicitly define absolute success before scoring, D&A reduces confirmation bias and provides fine‑grained, partial progress metrics that accurately penalize failures and interpolate successes. The approach generalizes across tasks, embodiments, and benchmarks, matching or surpassing post‑trained reward models while enabling efficient downstream reinforcement learning.