Maximum Satisfiability of Simple Temporal Problems
arXiv:2607. 23785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a core framework for quantitative temporal constraints.
The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a core framework for quantitative temporal constraints. As STP data can be inconsistent, we study MAXSTP: compute a maximum-cardinality consistent subset of constraints.
arXiv:2607. 23785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a core framework for quantitative temporal constraints.
arXiv:2602. 21312v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This work considers a number of optimization problems and reductive relations between them.
The paper investigates how optimization algorithms for hard combinatorial problems converge to trivial solutions. By combining rigorous large‑graph asymptotics with numerical experiments on maximum independent set and maximum K‑SAT, the authors show that convergence to the theoretically predicted bounds is extremely slow, especially in the intermediate regime of high constraint density. This reveals a significant gap between finite‑size performance and asymptotic expectations, indicating that practical algorithm design remains essential even when theory predicts inevitable failure.
arXiv:2002. 11508v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: TCSPs (Temporal Constraint Satisfaction Problems) [Dechter et al.
The paper proves that several decision and approximation problems for ReLU neural networks are computationally hard. For any number of layers λ≥2, deciding whether a network’s output is positive (and thus whether it is surjective) is W[ℓ−1]-hard when parameterized by the input dimension d. In particular, for two-layer networks, the related geometric problem of zonotope non‑containment is W[1]-hard in the ambient dimension, and computing or approximating the Lp‑Lipschitz constant is NP‑hard and W[ℓ−1]-hard with respect to d. The results also show that these problems remain hard when parameterized by the number of layers for constant d, implying that naive enumeration algorithms running in n^{(ℓ−1)d}·poly(N) time are essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.
The paper investigates how algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems converge to trivial solutions, focusing on finite-size behavior rather than asymptotic limits. By analyzing large-graph asymptotics and running numerical experiments on problems like maximum independent set and maximum K‑SAT, the authors show that convergence to theoretically predicted bounds is surprisingly slow. In the intermediate regime of high constraint density, local algorithms actually outperform their asymptotic predictions, highlighting a gap between finite-regime performance and asymptotic theory.
arXiv:2606. 26399v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study certain extremal problems in combinatorial geometry that ask about configurations of points in an $n \times n$ grid that satisfy strict, global geometric constraints.
We study certain extremal problems in combinatorial geometry that ask about configurations of points in an $n \times n$ grid that satisfy strict, global geometric constraints. Classical exact solvers suffer from combinatorial explosion for these types of problems, and standard reinforcement learning and transformer-based models struggle with the sparse reward "validity cliff" and quadratic token-consumption limits.
Consistent submodular maximization studies the tradeoff between solution quality and stability when elements arrive over time. For a monotone submodular objective, which models diminishing returns, an...
arXiv:2607. 21183v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The propositional abduction problem is a well-known form of non-monotonic reasoning where we are asked to find an explanation of a given manifestation.
The paper proves that training a binary quantized neural network (2-QNNT) is W[1]-hard when parameterized solely by the sum of input and output dimensions, α+ω. This hardness result holds even for zero training error on a specially constructed dataset where each input equals its target and the examples form a coordinate‑wise prefix chain. The proof reduces from DAG edge‑disjoint paths, employing a one‑flip routing equivalence that links activation transitions to vertex‑disjoint paths in the network.
arXiv:2608. 15143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constraint solving is a declarative approach for solving combinatorial satisfaction and optimization problems.