arXiv AI

Maximum Satisfiability of Simple Temporal Problems

arXiv:2607. 23785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Simple Temporal Problem (STP) is a core framework for quantitative temporal constraints.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

On the Slow Convergence to Trivial Solutions of Algorithms for Hard Optimization Problems

The paper investigates how optimization algorithms for hard combinatorial problems converge to trivial solutions. By combining rigorous large‑graph asymptotics with numerical experiments on maximum independent set and maximum K‑SAT, the authors show that convergence to the theoretically predicted bounds is extremely slow, especially in the intermediate regime of high constraint density. This reveals a significant gap between finite‑size performance and asymptotic expectations, indicating that practical algorithm design remains essential even when theory predicts inevitable failure.

By Ali Hussaini Umar, Jean Barbier, Matthieu Jonckheere, Manuel S\'aenz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Parameterized Hardness of Zonotope Containment and Neural Network Verification

The paper proves that several decision and approximation problems for ReLU neural networks are computationally hard. For any number of layers λ≥2, deciding whether a network’s output is positive (and thus whether it is surjective) is W[ℓ−1]-hard when parameterized by the input dimension d. In particular, for two-layer networks, the related geometric problem of zonotope non‑containment is W[1]-hard in the ambient dimension, and computing or approximating the Lp‑Lipschitz constant is NP‑hard and W[ℓ−1]-hard with respect to d. The results also show that these problems remain hard when parameterized by the number of layers for constant d, implying that naive enumeration algorithms running in n^{(ℓ−1)d}·poly(N) time are essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.

By Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo, Christoph Hertrich, Moritz Stargalla
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

On the Slow Convergence to Trivial Solutions of Algorithms for Hard Optimization Problems

The paper investigates how algorithms for hard combinatorial optimization problems converge to trivial solutions, focusing on finite-size behavior rather than asymptotic limits. By analyzing large-graph asymptotics and running numerical experiments on problems like maximum independent set and maximum K‑SAT, the authors show that convergence to theoretically predicted bounds is surprisingly slow. In the intermediate regime of high constraint density, local algorithms actually outperform their asymptotic predictions, highlighting a gap between finite-regime performance and asymptotic theory.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

Geometry-Aware MCTS for Extremal Problems in Combinatorial Geometry

We study certain extremal problems in combinatorial geometry that ask about configurations of points in an $n \times n$ grid that satisfy strict, global geometric constraints. Classical exact solvers suffer from combinatorial explosion for these types of problems, and standard reinforcement learning and transformer-based models struggle with the sparse reward "validity cliff" and quadratic token-consumption limits.

arXiv AI
Jun 3

Optimizing Explicit Unit-Distance Lower-Bound Certificates

arXiv:2606. 03419v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The 2026 disproof of Erd\H{o}s's unit-distance conjecture and Sawin's subsequent explicit quantitative refinement show that the maximum number $u(n)$ of unit distances among $n$ planar points can exceed $n^{1+\varepsilon}$ for a fixed positive $\varepsilon$.

By Michael T. M. Emmerich
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Binary Quantized Neural Network Training Is W[1]-Hard Parameterized by Input and Output Dimensions

The paper proves that training a binary quantized neural network (2-QNNT) is W[1]-hard when parameterized solely by the sum of input and output dimensions, α+ω. This hardness result holds even for zero training error on a specially constructed dataset where each input equals its target and the examples form a coordinate‑wise prefix chain. The proof reduces from DAG edge‑disjoint paths, employing a one‑flip routing equivalence that links activation transitions to vertex‑disjoint paths in the network.

By Tao Jiang, Minbo Gao, Shaowei Cai