arXiv AI

Translating finite-domain integer constraint models to CP/SMT/ILP/PB/SAT solvers with CPMpy

arXiv:2608. 15143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constraint solving is a declarative approach for solving combinatorial satisfaction and optimization problems.

arXiv AI
Jul 16

EZSMT Version 3, Matured

arXiv:2607. 13344v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constraint Answer Set Programming (CASP) is a hybrid reasoning paradigm that combines Answer Set Programming (ASP) with Constraint Processing and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), enabling powerful declarative encodings of complex combinatorial search problems.

By Yuliya Lierler
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Improving Constraint Models with LLM Agents

arXiv:2608. 08127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The runtime of Constraint Programming (CP) solvers is highly sensitive to modeling choices, such as symmetry breaking, implied constraints, global constraints, constraint reformulation, and variable representation.

By Florentina Voboril, Stefan Szeider
arXiv AI
Aug 5

IR2Solve: Structured Intermediate Representations for Cost-Efficient Optimization Autoformulation

arXiv:2608. 02641v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural-language optimization problems into solver-ready formulations, but direct code generation is brittle: schema, indexing, and semantic errors can cause compilation failures, infeasible models, or incorrect objectives, while iterative repair, search, and multi-agent workflows increase inference cost.

By Penglin Zhu, Linhai Zhang, Jungang Xu, Xinchi Wei, Xiuqi Wu
arXiv AI
Jul 24

Bound-Founded Semantics for Answer Set Programming with Difference Constraints: Preliminary Report

arXiv:2607. 21201v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While the integration of linear constraints has significantly expanded the reach of Answer Set Programming (ASP), existing hybrid solvers often rely on disparate semantic underpinnings that lack a unified logical foundation.

By Pedro Cabalar (University of A Corunna, Spain), Jorge Fandinno (University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA), Nicolas R\"uhling (University of Potsdam, Germany), Torsten Schaub (University of Potsdam, Germany,Potassco Solutions, Germany), Sebastian Schellhorn (University of Potsdam, Germany), Philipp Wanko (University of Potsdam, Germany,Potassco Solutions, Germany)
arXiv AI
Sep 2

SOVER: Formal Certification of Optimization Reformulations via LLM-Assisted SMT Verification

The paper introduces SOVER, a framework that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract semantic mappings between optimization reformulations and then formally verifies these mappings with SMT solvers. Z3 is employed to check domain cross-feasibility and objective-order preservation for mixed-integer linear problems, while dReal handles tolerance-aware feasibility and ε-argmin checks for continuous nonlinear problems. The authors also present NLEquiv-150, a benchmark of 150 nonlinear reformulation pairs, and report that SOVER correctly classifies 149 out of 150 pairs, including all 50 hard negatives, with the single error due to incomplete mapping extraction.

By Swapnil Bhattacharyya, Mayank Baranwal