arXiv:2608. 07183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal fusion architectures typically assume all modalities are available at inference, yet sensor failures, acquisition variability, and cost constraints routinely produce incomplete observations.
By Alireza Moayedikia
arXiv:2606. 06328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In healthcare, multimodal time series tasks often operate on incomplete observations in practice, for example when ECG segments are lost because electrodes detach or an entire respiratory channel is unavailable during overnight monitoring.
By Ziwen Kan, Wugeng Zheng, Tianlong Chen, Song Wang
arXiv:2608. 03611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) integrates text, audio, and vision to infer human affect, yet real-world multimodal observations are often incomplete.
By Chunlei Meng, Jacqueline J. Pang, Pengbin Feng, Zhenyu Yu, Chun Ouyang, Zhongxue Gan
arXiv:2608. 00076v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly support high-stakes decision making by combining complementary information from images and text.
By Vahidin Hasic, Chao Wang, Luis C. Garcia-Peraza-Herrera, David Watson, Senka Krivic
arXiv:2608. 05381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can process diverse sensory inputs, yet their reasoning remains heavily biased toward a dominant modality, resulting in brittle cross-modal reasoning.
By Swapnanil Mukherjee, Agyeya Negi, Tanuja Ganu, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
arXiv:2607. 27289v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The promise of multimodal fusion lies in combining complementary sources of evidence, yet more evidence does not always yield a better prediction.
By Yu Chang, Anzhe Cheng, Chenwei Wu, Zhuoran Wang, Jiahao Chen, Tamoghna Chattopadhyay, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Paul M. Thompson, Liyue Shen, Paul Bogdan
arXiv:2607. 24683v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-modal classification leverages complementary information across diverse data sources to enhance predictive performance.
By Francisco Mena, Dino Ienco, Roberto Interdonato, Cassio F. Dantas, Simon Besnard
arXiv:2606. 15743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses the missing-modality challenge in multi-modal learning by introducing Unsupervised Learning for Missing Modalities in Multi-Modal Learning (UL4M4), a flexible framework that imputes missing feature embeddings in a task-independent manner before supervised prediction.
By Hassan Ismkhan, Hamid Bouchahcia
arXiv:2608. 04013v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversations (MERC) highlight its reliance on complete multimodal inputs.
By Yuntao Shou, Tao Meng, Wei Ai, Keqin Li
arXiv:2608. 03475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal intent recognition combines linguistic, acoustic, and visual evidence, but individual modalities may be noisy, missing, semantically conflicting, or disproportionately dominant.
By Suraj Kumar, Mohnish Raj, Soumi Chattopadhayay, Chandranath Adak, Ayan Dutta
arXiv:2606. 12362v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study multimodal learning under missing modalities, with particular motivation from bioscience applications in which heterogeneous modalities are often only partially available when decisions need to be made.
By Hui Wang, Tianyu Ren, Joseph Butler, Christopher Baker, Karen Rafferty, Simon McDade
arXiv:2606. 30355v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As real-world prediction systems often face missing modalities at inference, incomplete multimodal learning (IML) remains a practical challenge.
By Seunghun Baek, Jihwan Park, Jaeyoon Sim, Minjae Jeong, Hoseok Lee, Won Hwa Kim