arXiv Computer Vision

Why Latent Actions Fail, and How to Prevent It

The paper examines why latent action models (LAMs) struggle when training on unlabeled videos that contain exogenous state such as background clutter. By extending a linear LAM framework to explicitly model exogenous state, the authors analytically show that the standard reconstruction objective causes latent actions to encode future exogenous information, and that focusing the representation on endogenous components mitigates this interference. They also demonstrate that auxiliary objectives like action-supervision encourage consistency across exogenous states, and validate these insights with experiments on both linear and nonlinear LAMs.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Contrastive World Models

Contrastive World Models propose a new method for learning latent dynamics without pixel reconstruction. By replacing observation reconstruction with a Deep InfoMax-like objective that maximizes mutual information between state-action sequences and local patch features of future observations, the approach encourages state representations to retain predictive information while ignoring visually irrelevant details. Experiments show that this method matches existing baselines in simple settings and significantly outperforms them when distractors or natural video backgrounds are present, while also training more efficiently by eliminating the pixel decoder.

By Bonnie Li
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Delta-JEPA: Learning Action-Sensitive World Models via Latent Difference Decoding

arXiv:2606. 31232v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning visual world models for planning requires compact latent dynamics that remain sensitive to actions, yet reconstruction-free joint-embedding objectives can collapse to action-insensitive representations.

By Zhenghao Zhang, Yuanxiang Wang, Zhenyu Guan, Yujia Yang, Bingkang Shi, Tianyu Zong, Hongzhu Yi, Guoqing Chao, Xingchen Chen, Tiankun Yang, Chenxi Bao, Tao Yu, Jingjing Zhou, Jungang Xu
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Action Forcing: Training World Models on Unsupervised Video by Recovering Underlying Egomotion Bases

The paper introduces Action Forcing, a method that transforms ordinary unlabeled video into action‑supervised training data by extracting egomotion bases through principal component analysis of pixel displacements. This approach yields grounded throttle–yaw control signals without requiring instrumented platforms or manual annotation, and it trains a high‑capacity video model while preventing pixel‑level overfitting via an online latent critic. The authors also critique standard video generation metrics and propose a reference‑free evaluation that measures controllability, plausibility, conjuring, and geometric integrity, showing that their model can reverse, scale, and compose actions despite limited reverse‑action data.

By Ashish Sundar, Tiankuo Hou, Zhong Fan, Chunbo Luo, Xiaoyang Wang
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 21

What Matters for Latent Actions in Robot Learning

arXiv:2608. 19613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Latent Action Models (LAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling robot learning to leverage large-scale unlabeled videos through latent actions that serve as compact surrogates for physical actions.

By Xizhou Bu, Qingda Hu, Lei Zhou, Lingfeng Zhang, Yingbo Tang, Zihao Liu, Xinyi Tao, Zhiqiang Ma, Qingqiu Huang, Chufeng Tang, Hongbo Wang, Jing Zhang, Jiayi Ma, Hangjun Ye, Wei Li, Xiaoshuai Hao