The study investigates whether using only abstracts of biomedical articles can produce lay summaries that match the quality of those derived from full texts, and whether few‑shot learning can replace fine‑tuning large language models. Experiments on two public datasets with two recent models show that abstract‑based summarization outperforms full‑text approaches in readability, factual consistency, semantic similarity, and runtime efficiency. Abstract fine‑tuning is 4.70 times faster and abstract zero‑ and few‑shot prompting is 5.31 times faster than full‑text methods, indicating that abstract‑based prompting reduces computational cost while preserving summary quality.
Scientific long-document summarization datasets commonly treat author-written abstracts as gold reference summaries, although their quality and alignment with the source article vary. At the same time, publicly available scientific summarization datasets remain limited in scale and structure for modern long-context models.
arXiv:2606. 05436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Summarizing the latest medical literature to guide clinical decision-making is essential for evidence-based medicine and high-quality patient care.
The study evaluates AI-generated summaries for cancer patients using a dual assessment framework that includes human experts and LLM-as-a-judge. Human domain experts—oncology clinicians and patient-facing care staff—assess summary quality on accuracy, clinical relevance, and readability. The research identifies limitations such as omissions and minor inaccuracies, which are then used to iteratively refine prompts, grounding, and safety guardrails.
arXiv:2607. 15829v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated essay scoring (AES) enables scalable assessment and timely feedback but remains challenged by transformer input-length limitations, which can cause information loss when processing long essays.
Loss-Based Active Learning for Neural Abstractive Summarization proposes LOBSTER, an active learning framework that selects unlabeled documents similar to the model’s high‑loss training examples to correct specific weaknesses. The method is tailored for abstractive summarization, addressing instability and computational bottlenecks seen in prior work. Experiments on three benchmark datasets and two backbone models show that LOBSTER matches or surpasses state‑of‑the‑art performance while speeding up query selection by up to 665×.
arXiv:2606. 05494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
arXiv:2606. 05494v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
The paper examines how Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Named Entity Recognition (NER) affect the quality of lay summaries of radiology reports. Using a framework that extracts clinically relevant findings via NER and grounds them with RAG, the authors evaluate few‑shot and fine‑tuned versions of Qwen and BioBART. Results show that NER consistently improves readability and overall quality, RAG alone offers no benefit and can introduce hallucinations, and the best performance comes from fine‑tuned BioBART with NER.
arXiv:2601.03418v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Trustworthy clinical summarization requires every claim to be traceable to its evidence, yet existing attribution often resolves only to the senten...
arXiv:2606. 08000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The progress of large language models (LLMs) has fueled claims that model-generated summaries rival or even surpass human-written references, raising questions about whether summarization remains an open research problem.
arXiv:2609.13481v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have made abstractive summarization remarkably fluent, but generated summaries can hallucinate facts, posing serious risks in bio...
arXiv:2608. 03655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Abstractive summarization models remain vulnerable to factual inconsistency, redundancy, and weak length control.