arXiv:2605. 27914v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Benchmarking is mature where answers are verifiable -- math, code, reasoning -- but the fastest-growing uses of LLMs are subjective and human-facing: companionship, emotional support, counseling.
By Yuming (Rapheal), Huang, Yao Liu, Pengjie Ding, Lei Wang, Junchen Wan
arXiv:2606. 10968v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become standard for improving LLM reasoning.
By Renjie Mao, Xiangxin Zhou, Lvfang Tao, Yixin Ding, Yu Shi, Yongguang Lin, Yuheng Wu, Honglin Zhu, Qian Qiu, Wenxi Zhu
arXiv:2509. 04027v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Test-time scaling, primarily manifested through multi-step Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning via Reinforcement Learning (RL), has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs).
By Zeyu Gan, Hao Yi, Yong Liu
arXiv:2606. 10209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models deployed as autonomous agents for enterprise workflows face a key challenge: verbose tool responses from enterprise systems can cause context overflow, stale-state errors, and high inference cost.
By Abhilasha Lodha, Mahsa Pahlavikhah Varnosfaderani, Abir Chakraborty, Abhinav Mithal
arXiv:2606. 10466v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In time-series generation, existing approaches typically handcraft ortrain a separate model for each dataset, which hinders their scalability and fails to leverage shared temporal structures across domains.
By Du Yin, Hao Xue, Jinliang Deng, Yang Yang, Shuang Ao, Arian Prabowo, Flora Salim
arXiv:2606. 10571v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial examples reveal vulnerabilities in Vision-Language Pre-training (VLP) models and provide insights for improving robustness.
By Lijia Yu, Jiuxin Cao, Yuchen Qiang, Changhao Chen, Yifei Huang, Bo Liu
arXiv:2606. 11182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we propose EEVEE, the first multi-dataset test-time prompt learning framework for LLM agents, enabling test-time prompt learning under real-world task streams.
By Weixian Xu, Shilong Liu, Mengdi Wang
arXiv:2606. 09888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear attention provides an efficient backbone for long-sequence recommendation by avoiding the quadratic cost of standard Transformers, but its compressed recurrent state can be dominated by repetitive behavior patterns.
By Zhuang Zhuang, Zhipeng Wei, Ji Dai, Jie Chen, Fei Pan, Peng Jiang, Kun Gai
arXiv:2606. 10321v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) trains autoregressive policies to solve routing problems.
By Carlos S. Sep\'ulveda, Gonzalo A. Ruz
arXiv:2606. 10956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The deployment of Large Language Model (LLM) agents for computer automation is accelerating, yet their ability to navigate complex, professional-grade productivity software is largely untested.
By Tengchao Lv, Dongdong Zhang, Jiayu Ding, Yilin Jia, Yuzhong Zhao, Yupan Huang, Wenshan Wu, Xiangyang Zhou, Shaohan Huang, Nan Yang, Li Dong, Lei Cui, Furu Wei
arXiv:2606. 10768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The success of Large Language Models in mathematical reasoning relies heavily on the generation of diverse and valid solution paths during the rollout phase.
By Xukun Zhu, Hang Yu, Peng Di, Linchao Zhu
arXiv:2606. 11105v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucinations, where language models (LMs) generate factually ungrounded responses, pose serious risks, as users tend to blindly rely on them.
By Haeji Jung, Hila Gonen
arXiv:2606. 09843v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) produce stable self-reports on personality inventories, but these self-reports do not predict observed behavior.
By Juan Manuel Contreras
arXiv:2606. 09885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts large language models (LLMs) scale efficiently through sparse activation, yet their deployment is fundamentally constrained by the large static parameter footprint of experts.
By Jiangyang He, Shaolin Zhu, Deyi Xiong
arXiv:2606. 10572v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: External memory effectively grounds large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs)-based question answering (QA) in relevant multimodal evidence.
By Zhi Zheng, Ziqiao Meng, Hao Luan, Wei Liu, Wee Sun Lee
arXiv:2602. 12424v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Benchmarks establish a standardized evaluation framework to systematically assess the performance of large language models (LLMs), facilitating objective comparisons and driving advancements in the field.
By Ziqian Zhang, Xingjian Hu, Yue Huang, Kai Zhang, Ruoxi Chen, Yixin Liu, Qingsong Wen, Kaidi Xu, Xiangliang Zhang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Lichao Sun
arXiv:2606. 09850v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training alignment algorithms are predominantly evaluated as black boxes, obscuring how they reshape language models' internal computations.
By Aarush Sinha, Ishan Garg, Veeraraju Elluru, Arth Singh, Kushal Garg
arXiv:2606. 10587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are on the rise for accelerating scientific discovery, most recently in advanced tasks such as generating valid scientific hypotheses.
By Haorui Wang, Parshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Kunyang Sun, Jos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato, Teresa Head-Gordon, Jiajun He, Chandan K. Reddy, Chao Zhang, Yuanqi Du
arXiv:2602. 17907v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Traditional neural topic models are typically optimized by reconstructing the document's Bag-of-Words (BoW) representations, overlooking contextual information and struggling with data sparsity.
By Raymond Li, Amirhossein Abaskohi, Chuyuan Li, Gabriel Murray, Giuseppe Carenini
arXiv:2606. 10796v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic Depression Detection (ADD) from clinical interviews is a pivotal task in computational mental health, yet it remains challenging due to two critical obstacles: 1) difficulty in modeling complex but sparsely distributed depression clues within lengthy, multi-topic clinical interviews, leading to superficial and unreliable reasoning; 2) scarcity of labeled data due to clinical privacy, together with high cost of training and fine-tuning, limiting the deployment of supervised ADD systems.
By Yiqing Lyu, Xianbing Zhao, Buzhou Tang, Ronghuan Jiang