AI agents

Tool use, function calling, orchestration and the protocols that let models act rather than only answer.

15,743 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Oct 2

PPO-HRAP: Proximal Policy Optimization with a Hybrid Regime-Aware Policy for Risk-Controlled Trading

PPO‑HRAP introduces a hybrid regime‑aware policy that blends Proximal Policy Optimization with a volatility‑conditioned regime prior to balance upside participation and drawdown control in trading. The agent uses market and portfolio features, rewards that combine log return, VIX‑conditioned drawdown penalty, exposure deviation, and turnover cost, and outputs a blended action between the PPO actor and the regime‑derived target exposure. In backtests on SPY (2020‑2022) it achieved a 27.62% total return, 8.48% annualized return, and reduced maximum drawdown from 34.10% to 18.47%, while maintaining stable performance across multiple seeds and ranking first on total return and Sharpe ratio in single‑run cross‑asset tests on QQQ and DIA.

By Duong Hien Chi Kien, Thanh Trung Huynh
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Beyond Memory: Harnessing Long-Horizon Agents with Explicit Belief States

Beyond Memory: Harnessing Long-Horizon Agents with Explicit Belief States introduces PoS, an inference-time framework that builds and maintains explicit belief states to guide large language model agents. Each belief state combines an estimate of the current world with unresolved task requirements, making clear what the agent still needs to learn and accomplish. PoS validates consistency, monitors task progress to detect Belief Trapping, and tailors recovery to the trapping pattern and unresolved requirements, achieving top performance across four benchmarks with all three LLM backbones.

By Yu Luo, Jiamin Jiang, Yimin Zuo, Xidao Wen, Rongchen Gao, Yongqian Sun, Shenglin Zhang, Guiyang Liu, Cheng Zhang, Fang Situ, Qi Zhou, Dan Pei
arXiv AI
Oct 2

MCRI: A Four-Dimensional Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Agent Skills

The paper introduces MCRI, a four‑dimensional framework for analyzing and evaluating agent skills, and implements it as MCRI‑Eval, a large‑language‑model‑based evaluation method. Using 63,812 public skills from OpenClaw and 58,275 skill‑conditioned executions across BigCodeBench, BFCL‑Fundamental, and Mind2Web, MCRI‑Eval’s scores correlate with community popularity and outperform other methods in downstream ranking agreement. The evaluation also shows that MCRI‑Eval improves top‑1 skill selection by 17.7, 22.8, and 19.6 percentile points on the three benchmarks, offering a valuable pre‑execution signal for prioritizing promising skills before costly evaluation.

By Zongrui Yang, Li Xintong, Runchen Xu, Zhongsheng Wang, Zhedong Lin, Haoyuan Li, Jiamou Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Agents Are Systems, Not Models: Rethinking Agentic Evaluation

The paper argues that evaluating agents as fixed models is insufficient, proposing instead to treat them as configurable systems. Using a new benchmark of four scientific tasks, the authors analyze how five configuration aspects—task information, reasoning, self‑verification, time budget, and backbone model—affect performance, noting that about 54% of outcome variance arises from run‑to‑run differences even with the same settings. The study finds that providing more task information has the strongest impact, while interactions among settings (e.g., extra time only helps with adequate information or model capability) and the choice of verification tools significantly shape agent behavior.

By Luis Wiedmann, Leander Girrbach, Cordelia Schmid, Zeynep Akata
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Not All Experience Belongs in the Weights: Component Routing for Self-Improving GUI Agents

The paper introduces component routing for self‑improving GUI agents, separating experience into locators, procedures, state facts, and lessons, and directing each to either the model weights or the prompt context. Experiments across three backbone families, two environments, and multiple seeds show that routing improves performance over whole‑trajectory baselines, with a rule based on recurrence and state‑conditionality accurately predicting the optimal destination. The study also analyzes how training dynamics and producer‑consumer differences affect the value of each destination, revealing that readout decreases for frequently recurring items when written to weights, while context gains grow with the information gap and weight gains shrink with the policy gap.

By Beining Wu, Zihao Ding, Jun Huang
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Temporal-Difference Learning for Dragonchess

The paper examines the performance of evolutionary transfer learning and TD(lambda) in the three‑dimensional chess game Dragonchess. By re‑implementing the engine in C++ to accelerate play, the authors ran 10,000 games with statistical confidence, showing both adaptive methods outperform all other agents in a round‑robin tournament. The results indicate no significant performance difference between the evolved and learned evaluation functions, demonstrating the effectiveness of adaptive techniques in complex, novel game domains.

By Jim O'Connor, Annika Hoag, Sarah Goyette, Gary B. Parker
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Mingbird: A Local-First Agent Harness Enabling Small Open Models to Complete Real Tasks

Mingbird is a local‑first agent harness designed for small open‑weight language models (2–9 B) that run on ordinary laptops. It introduces ten mechanisms—such as a byte‑level net‑zero prefill budget, a finish gate that re‑reads the task before accepting completion, and signature‑level loop detection—to address common failure modes that arise from the harness rather than the model itself. In controlled experiments on the LRAB benchmark and the $ au^2$‑bench, Mingbird achieves higher overall scores (0.886 and 0.856 respectively) compared to other harnesses, and its ablation studies show that each mechanism contributes measurable performance gains.

By Hao Wang, Ting Huang
arXiv AI
Oct 2

ScholarCatalyst: A Benchmark for Retrieving Papers That Inspire New Research

ScholarCatalyst is a new benchmark that evaluates how well AI systems can retrieve research papers that inspire new work. The dataset was created by having 184 lead authors of 207 recent computer science papers annotate which earlier papers helped their projects, providing detailed rationales. The benchmark tests retrieval from the literature available at the start of a project, revealing that current agentic search and even advanced models like Claude Fable 5.1 perform only modestly better than simple embedding retrieval.

By Sohyeon Kim, Yoonho Lee, Bo Liu, Dayoon Ko, Rulin Shao, Seungone Kim, Graham Neubig, Pang Wei Koh, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Akari Asai, Omar Khattab, Yejin Choi, Gunhee Kim, Chelsea Finn
arXiv AI
Oct 2

The Delegation Danger Band: Why Mid-Capability Sub-Agents Over-Trust Inherited Stale State

The paper investigates how inherited state affects sub-agent performance in multi-agent frameworks, comparing three inheritance policies—Reset, Selective, and Full—across a ladder of Qwen3 models. It finds that reliance on stale state decreases with model capability, but a mid-capability model (Qwen3‑1.7B) exhibits a statistically significant local minimum of net harm, defining a "danger band." Selective handoff consistently improves accuracy over Full, especially within the danger band, while a fixed-threshold router fails on other datasets.

By Jundong Hu, Shekar Ramachandran
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Probabilistic Plan Legibility with Off-the-shelf Planners

The paper introduces a method for generating legible plans in arbitrary PDDL domains by extending prior legibility research to classical planning without custom planners. It incorporates a second‑order theory of mind to estimate the observer’s perspective, enabling robots to implicitly communicate goals in human‑robot teaming. Benchmark results show that increasing legibility typically trades off with plan efficiency, and a regularizing factor is needed to balance the two.

By Michele Persiani, Thomas Hellstr\"om
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration

The paper introduces Nous, a framework that separates learning, calibration, and revision certification for belief‑based agent memory. It shows that learning and certifying useful memory decisions can require quadratically fewer records than source calibration, and provides finite‑sample certificates for policy improvement without needing to recover source reliability. Experiments on MiniGrid environments demonstrate that the new certificate reliably accepts improvements over incumbents, outperforming earlier methods.

By Pranav Singh