arXiv:2602. 01359v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although recent studies on time-series anomaly detection have increasingly adopted ever-larger neural network architectures such as transformers and foundation models, they incur high computational costs and memory usage, making them impractical for real-time and resource-constrained scenarios.
By Jinju Park, Seokho Kang
arXiv:2604. 17388v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series anomaly detectors have grown steadily more complex, incorporating attention mechanisms, adversarial training, and stochastic latent variables.
By Kadir-Kaan \"Ozer, Ren\'e Ebeling, Markus Enzweiler
arXiv:2606. 01300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time series anomaly detection is a crucial task in various domains, including finance, healthcare, and industry.
By Uzair Khan, Luigi Capogrosso, Francesco Biondani, Michele Magno, Franco Fummi, Francesco Setti, Marco Cristani
arXiv:2606. 09874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reconstruction-based methods are widely used for time series anomaly detection, where models are trained to reconstruct subsequences, and anomalies are identified through reconstruction errors.
By Guillaume Coulaud (UM, IROKO), Reza Akbarinia (IROKO), Florent Masseglia (IROKO)
arXiv:2608. 15965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Progress in streaming, edge-level graph anomaly detection (GAD) has been marked by increasingly elaborate architectures, from count-min-sketch chi square tests to memory-augmented attention networks.
By Omair Shafi Ahmed, Zohair Shafi
arXiv:2604. 13924v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) is critical in domains such as industrial monitoring, healthcare, and cybersecurity, but it remains challenging due to rare and heterogeneous anomalies and the scarcity of labelled data.
By Romain Hermary, Samet Hicsonmez, Dan Pineau, Abd El Rahman Shabayek, Djamila Aouada
arXiv:2604. 14221v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reliable evaluation of anomaly detection methods in multivariate time series remains an open challenge, largely due to the limitations of existing benchmark datasets.
By Pierre Lotte (EPE UT, IRIT), Andr\'e P\'eninou (UT2J, IRIT-SIG, IRIT), Olivier Teste (IRIT-SIG, IRIT, UT2J, Comue de Toulouse)
arXiv:2507. 15584v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the continuous proposal of new anomaly detection algorithms and extensive benchmarking efforts, progress seems to stagnate, with only minor performance differences between established baselines and new algorithms.
By Philipp R\"ochner, Simon Kl\"uttermann, Kevin Kammler, Franz Rothlauf, Emmanuel M\"uller, Daniel Schl\"or
arXiv:2509. 18751v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recently reconstruction-based deep models have been widely used for time series anomaly detection, but as their capacity and generalization capability increase, these models tend to over-generalize, often reconstructing unseen anomalies accurately.
By Samuel Yoon, Jongwon Kim, Juyoung Ha, Young Myoung Ko
arXiv:2603. 10926v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automotive anomaly detectors are often selected from accuracy only benchmarks on workstation class hardware, whereas in-vehicle monitoring requires predictable scoring latency under limited CPU parallelism.
By Kadir-Kaan \"Ozer, Ren\'e Ebeling, Markus Enzweiler
arXiv:2606. 20055v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection has significant practical value for industrial and medical monitoring, as well as other critical domains.
By Youji Zhu, Hongbing Wang, Wenchao Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Xiangguang Xiong
arXiv:2608. 03391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Precise anomaly localization over long-context time series is a crucial task in monitoring applications across clinical care, industrial operations, financial services, and logistics, where brief evidence may hide inside long spans of high-frequency data.
By Nicolas Zumarraga, Lorenzo Steno, Ning Wang, Max Rosenblattl, Thomas Kaar, Maxwell A. Xu, Kevin O'Sullivan, Markus Kreft, Elgar Fleisch, Paul Schmiedmayer, Patrick Langer, Robert Jakob