arXiv AI By Khalid M. Saqr

Zero-shot reasoning for simulating scholarly peer-review

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2510. 02027v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scholarly publishing requires scalable scrutiny supported by auditable evidence.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

How Closely Do LLM Reviews Align with Human Peer Review?

arXiv:2608. 03659v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate scientific reviews, yet existing evaluations rarely examine whether different providers align with both conference decisions and human reviewing priorities within the same controlled setting.

By Abraham Camelo-Guerrero, Jairo Diaz-Rodriguez