arXiv:2607. 20526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in settings where fluent but incorrect answers can be costly.
By Matthew ffrench-Constant, Daniel Yang, Xinmeng Huang, Sanyam Kapoor
The study evaluates whether a single confidence threshold in typed decision interfaces treats all languages equally. Using 1,000 items in 51 languages across three vendors, it finds that English consistently achieves higher coverage—clearing the 0.9 threshold 8.6–11.7 percentage points more often than other languages—despite similar accuracy. Even when thresholds are re‑weighted or calibrated per language, the gap persists, and translating inputs into English reduces but does not eliminate it. The authors recommend reporting per‑language coverage at the operating threshold.
By Junwei Yao, Yongxi Zhou, Zike Yang, Zhijun Wang, Jianan Liu, Yanxian Chen, Wenbo Ye
Zuse is a family of decision models (4B, 9B, and 27B) that predict probabilities for a fixed set of options across 27 European languages by training a low‑rank adapter and a pointer head on frozen open‑weight bases. The 27B model achieves 87.5 % accuracy on a broad European test suite of 11 sources, 9 task groups, and 27 languages, with a pooled expected calibration error of 0.016. Post‑hoc analysis reveals that miscalibration is task‑dependent, that automated decision share aligns more with chance‑corrected skill than raw accuracy, and that performance on languages outside the base model’s documented list is consistently lower.
By Umair Mehmood Imam
arXiv:2610.17205v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based decision-making systems, also called System One models, have recently gained popularity, most notably through Jev (Almeida, 2026). Given a ty...
By Jonathan Geuter, Andrew Cheng, David Alvarez-Melis
SyntaxBench is a diagnostic benchmark and statistical evaluation framework for character‑level reasoning in large language models, comprising five core tasks—character counting, letter containment, palindrome detection, edit distance, and longest‑string selection—and a harder substring‑extraction stress test called index_to_span. The benchmark uses paired English and random‑string inputs, zero‑, one‑, and four‑shot prompts, and evaluates models from 2B to 32B parameters across multiple reasoning modes. It reports a wide range of metrics, including exact‑match and relaxed accuracy, Cohen’s kappa, McNemar tests, bootstrap confidence intervals, Kendall’s tau, class‑conditional metrics, tokenization analysis, and multiple‑comparison‑corrected tests.
By Mohsen Larni (Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Sobhan Ebrahimi Azar (Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Pouyan Nahed (Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas), Kazem Taghva (Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
The paper investigates position bias in large language models (LLMs) across a wide range of model sizes—from billions to trillions of parameters—and across five languages. It finds that while small-scale models and non‑English languages still exhibit noticeable position bias, larger models and the use of Chain‑of‑Thought prompting substantially reduce this bias. Additionally, the study shows that emerging thinking models with advanced reasoning capabilities are almost immune to position bias, indicating a promising but resource‑intensive path to mitigating this vulnerability.
By Yining Li, Huayang Li, Lemao Liu, Taro Watanabe