arXiv Computation and Language By Marcus Armstrong

Written Once, Read Differently How Language Models Own Answers Steer Their Next Ones

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper investigates how a language model’s first answer to a yes/no question influences its subsequent answer to a different question about the same entity, a phenomenon termed self‑commitment. By fixing the initial answer and measuring changes in the second across 3,600 question pairs for 22 open‑weight models (0.5B–72B parameters), the authors find that each answer writes a commitment direction into the residual stream, and the similarity of these directions predicts answer coupling. They show that ablating a shared direction reduces coupling significantly, while the reading circuit for this direction varies with model size, instruction tuning, and prompts, and that sparing the attention sink during ablation preserves low perplexity cost in most models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

MechaTerp-TRACE: A Novel Approach for Component Ablation Analysis in Language Models

MechaTerp-TRACE is a new framework that systematically ablates individual components of language models to measure their causal contribution to producing a named entity. By applying TRACE to thirteen instruction‑tuned dense decoder models, the study finds that a small set of positionally fixed components consistently carry the most influence across models and prompts, while the remaining support is evenly distributed. This suggests that entity knowledge is largely embedded in generic generation machinery rather than in isolated, findable components.

By Brandon Colelough, Davis Bartels, Madeline Bittner, Dina Demner-Fushman