Write What Matters: Disentangling Token Selection from Slot Allocation in Recurrent Memory
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 28876v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context language models often conflate two different goals: compressing history into an efficient state, and maintaining reliable long-term memory.
arXiv:2607. 25357v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context recall in linear-time sequence models highlights a tradeoff in how they write to memory.
arXiv:2606. 28876v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study memory-managed long-context attention: explicit bounded memory with a learned query-independent writer, lifecycle control, query-aware reading, calibrated sparse fallback, and frozen-LLM generation from raw evidence.
arXiv:2608. 12435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformers owe much of their strong long-context retrieval capability to a token-level memory that grows with context length.
RAM‑Net introduces a linear‑time sequence model that replaces dense access to a shared recurrent state with sparse, address‑based access. The model arranges the state as a fixed‑size array of independent slots and uses an Address Decoder to map each token’s key or query to a small subset of slots, thereby reducing inter‑token interference. Empirical results show that RAM‑Net outperforms strong recurrent baselines on fine‑grained long‑range retrieval, achieves the lowest perplexity in commonsense reasoning, and accesses far fewer state elements per step than competing models.
arXiv:2609.39661v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-attention gives LLMs fine-grained, query-dependent access to context, but dense token interactions incur quadratic prefill cost and a key--value c...