As foundation models evolve from information generation to digital work execution, agents are increasingly capable of completing complex tasks across tools, applications, and workflows. However, exist...
The paper introduces WorkForge, a scalable synthesis framework that builds verifiable work‑agent environments from real‑world resources. By extracting factual anchors from expert workflows and associated files, WorkForge generates task instructions, solution plans, and verifiers that remain traceable to observable workspace evidence. The authors constructed 16.7K environments across 40 professional domains, demonstrating significant performance gains for large language models such as Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base and Qwen3.5-27B.
By Jiazheng Zhang, Long Ma, Yunxian Yang, Zhiheng Xi, Zhikai Lei, Yajie Yang, Chenyang Liao, Enyu Zhou, Yang Nan, Yuchen Tian, Senjie Jin, Yibo Wang, Wei He, Boyang Liu, Jixuan Huang, Xin Guo, Zhezheng Hao, Xinbing Liang, Zhihao Zhang, Changzhi Zhou, Wiggin Zhou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Clarenceai, Aiden Adams
The paper proposes a new way to describe benchmarks for AI systems that perform knowledge work, outlining four explicit fields: represented activity, tested setting, required work product, and evaluated result. It builds an inventory of 18 work activities from O*NET to enable activity-level reporting across occupations, and evaluates these activities for semantic coherence, algorithm sensitivity, ontology legibility, and human interpretability. The authors apply their framework to three existing benchmarks—GDPval, OfficeQA Pro, and APEX-SWE—to show how different aspects of work can be captured within the same representation.
By Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Cyrus Ayubcha, Levi Lian
arXiv:2608. 05013v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly applied to open-ended everyday requests that span work, study, and life.
By Jingsheng Zheng, Xinyuan Fang, Jintian Zhang, Zhengke Gui, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
Harness-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how different harness configurations affect LLM agent performance in realistic workflows. It tests 106 sandboxed offline tasks across multiple model backends, recording artifacts, execution traces, and usage statistics to analyze completion, process quality, efficiency, and failure behavior. The study finds significant variation in outcomes across model-harness pairings, indicating that agent capability should be reported at the configuration level rather than solely by the base model.
By Yilun Yao, Xinyu Tan, Chao-Hsuan Liu, Yaoming Li, Zhengyang Wang, Zongwei Lv, Wenhan Yu, Zhewen Tan, Yuxuan Tian, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Guangxiang Zhao, Tong Yang
The paper introduces KNOWS, a benchmark for evaluating web agents that act as assistants by retrieving, synthesizing, and presenting information across complex, multi-step browser tasks. It outlines a task design rubric, evaluation protocol combining deterministic checks with LLM judgments, and reports that current agents achieve only modest success, with the best performing agent succeeding on less than 3% of tasks. The study highlights significant gaps in agents’ tool use, visual understanding, and long‑horizon reasoning.
By Alexander Gill, Md Farhan Ishmam, Xuyen Nguyen, Neha Bhat, Parker Henry DeYoung, Fateme Hashemi Chaleshtori, Nathan Stringham, Kenneth Marino, Ana Marasovi\'c