arXiv Machine Learning By Wensi Zhang, Tomas Teijeiro, J\'er\^ome Thevenot, David Atienza

Why ML-based cough models do not generalize: a systematic cross-dataset evaluation for tuberculosis screening

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The study investigates why machine‑learning models for tuberculosis screening based on cough acoustics fail to generalize across datasets. Classical ML and deep‑learning classifiers achieved moderate performance within their own datasets (ROC‑AUC up to 0.755) but performed poorly on external data, often below 0.6. The authors found that audio features were more influenced by recording device and dataset than by TB status, and that device‑diverse training improved transfer while device mismatch degraded it. A clinical‑variable baseline showed more consistent generalization, suggesting acquisition‑specific variability is a stronger driver of poor generalizability than population shift.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

Beyond Classification: A Cough Regression Benchmark for Respiratory Acoustic Foundation Models

arXiv:2606. 15436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Respiratory acoustic foundation models (FMs) excel at cough classification, yet their ability to predict continuous health quantities from cough audio remains largely unexplored, despite the clinical value of passive age, BMI, and disease probability estimation in settings where physical measurements are unavailable.

By Mayur Sanap, Prasanna Desikan, Edgar Lobaton
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

Cross-cohort TB classification using clinical data gathered in Uganda and South Africa

The study evaluates machine learning models—logistic regression, multilayer perceptrons, and convolutional neural networks—on clinical and demographic data from Uganda and South Africa to screen for tuberculosis. Feature selection improves AUROC by 2–7% across models, with logistic regression achieving 0.80–0.84 AUROC on held‑out data. While deeper networks show inconsistent performance on external cohorts, logistic regression remains within 1–2% of the best AUROC and narrowly misses WHO sensitivity targets.

By Joshua M. Jansen van V\"uren, Devendra S. Parihar, Daphne Naidoo, Marisa Klopper, Frank Cobelens, Lutz Kolbe, Kimsey Zajac, Willy Ssengooba, Moses Joloba, Grant Theron, Thomas R. Niesler
arXiv AI
Oct 27

Feature Scaling Beats Architecture Choice in Offline Respiratory Screening for Low-Resource Clinics

The study compares classical and deep learning classifiers for a five‑class respiratory‑sound dataset of 1,211 clips. An SVM using 30 summary features (MFCC, ZCR, RMS) achieves macro recall of 0.78, while a 1.13M‑parameter convolutional‑recurrent network reaches 0.75–0.77; no clear advantage is found between model families. The largest performance gain comes from standardizing the SVM’s features, which boosts macro recall by 27 points, far exceeding any architectural difference.

By Abubakar Chilala, Cleophas Kadima, Innocent Anyaele, Victor Olufemi