arXiv Machine Learning By Wensi Zhang, Tomas Teijeiro, J\'er\^ome Thevenot, David Atienza

Why ML-based cough models do not generalize: a systematic cross-dataset evaluation for tuberculosis screening

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The study investigates why machine‑learning models for tuberculosis screening based on cough acoustics fail to generalize across datasets. Classical ML and deep‑learning classifiers achieved moderate performance within their own datasets (ROC‑AUC up to 0.755) but performed poorly on external data, often below 0.6. The authors found that audio features were more influenced by recording device and dataset than by TB status, and that device‑diverse training improved transfer while device mismatch degraded it. A clinical‑variable baseline showed more consistent generalization, suggesting acquisition‑specific variability is a stronger driver of poor generalizability than population shift.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 16

Beyond Classification: A Cough Regression Benchmark for Respiratory Acoustic Foundation Models

arXiv:2606. 15436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Respiratory acoustic foundation models (FMs) excel at cough classification, yet their ability to predict continuous health quantities from cough audio remains largely unexplored, despite the clinical value of passive age, BMI, and disease probability estimation in settings where physical measurements are unavailable.

By Mayur Sanap, Prasanna Desikan, Edgar Lobaton
arXiv AI
Sep 4

LLM4CKD: Large Language Models for Early Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Screening

The paper introduces LLM4CKD, a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) for early chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening without task‑specific training. By employing clinically selected tabular features and structured prompt templates, the authors evaluate LLMs in zero‑shot and few‑shot settings against traditional machine learning, deep learning, and tabular foundation models. Results show that LLMs can match or outperform conventional methods in low‑data scenarios, though their performance varies with model choice and input complexity, highlighting a trade‑off between data efficiency and stability.

By Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Sirajam Munira
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Robust Lightweight Deep Learning Models for Oral Cancer Screening

arXiv:2608.21583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Oral cancer is a leading cause of mortality in low-to-middle-income countries, where a shortage of specialists delays diagnosis. While point-of-care sc...

By Siddhant Bharadwaj, Aakash Shedsale, Tejashree Subramanya, Mohd. Azfar, Praveen Birur, Debnath Pal, Shankararama Sharma, Anupama Shetty, Rajesh Sundaresan