Whose Ground Truth? Embracing Ambiguity in Human-Centered AI

The paper titled "Whose Ground Truth? Embracing Ambiguity in Human-Centered AI" argues that current AI systems assume a single definitive ground truth, which ignores the inherent ambiguity in human interpretations. It calls for modeling the full space of plausible human judgments, distinguishing true ambiguity from noise, and suggests that this shift should influence how AI is represented, learned, evaluated, deployed, and governed.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.